BACKGROUND: Few studies in Brazil have been published about sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and none has addressed the mother's orientation about placing the infant to sleep in the supine position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on mothers of an individual educational intervention in the maternity ward about infant sleep position. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a study sample of 228 mother-infant pairs assigned to an intervention or a control group. The intervention consisted of an individual orientation session at the maternity ward, at which folders and an oral explanation were given to mothers at discharge about the importance of the supine position as a preventive measure for SIDS. The outcome was the sleeping position at 3 months of age assessed during a home visit. The variables with p< 0.2 at a bivariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among mothers in the intervention group, 42.9 percent put their infants to sleep in a supine position at the 3-month visit, compared with 24 percent of mothers in the control group (p = 0.009). In a multivariate analysis, the intervention at the hospital was the only variable that influenced maternal practices with respect to infant sleep positioning (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.17-4.19). CONCLUSIONS: An individual educational session in the maternity ward about infant sleep position significantly increased the prevalence of supine position for sleeping in the infant's third month. Nevertheless, the intervention was not sufficient to guarantee that most mothers would put their infants to sleep in the recommended position.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few studies in Brazil have been published about sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and none has addressed the mother's orientation about placing the infant to sleep in the supine position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on mothers of an individual educational intervention in the maternity ward about infant sleep position. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a study sample of 228 mother-infant pairs assigned to an intervention or a control group. The intervention consisted of an individual orientation session at the maternity ward, at which folders and an oral explanation were given to mothers at discharge about the importance of the supine position as a preventive measure for SIDS. The outcome was the sleeping position at 3 months of age assessed during a home visit. The variables with p< 0.2 at a bivariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among mothers in the intervention group, 42.9 percent put their infants to sleep in a supine position at the 3-month visit, compared with 24 percent of mothers in the control group (p = 0.009). In a multivariate analysis, the intervention at the hospital was the only variable that influenced maternal practices with respect to infant sleep positioning (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.17-4.19). CONCLUSIONS: An individual educational session in the maternity ward about infant sleep position significantly increased the prevalence of supine position for sleeping in the infant's third month. Nevertheless, the intervention was not sufficient to guarantee that most mothers would put their infants to sleep in the recommended position.
Authors: Rachel Y Moon; Fern R Hauck; Eve R Colson; Ann L Kellams; Nicole L Geller; Timothy Heeren; Stephen M Kerr; Emily E Drake; Kawai Tanabe; Mary McClain; Michael J Corwin Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John P Elder; Willo Pequegnat; Saifuddin Ahmed; Gretchen Bachman; Merry Bullock; Waldemar A Carlo; Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli; Nathan A Fox; Sara Harkness; Gillian Huebner; Joan Lombardi; Velma McBride Murry; Allisyn Moran; Maureen Norton; Jennifer Mulik; Will Parks; Helen H Raikes; Joseph Smyser; Caroline Sugg; Michael Sweat; Nurper Ulkuer Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014
Authors: Ethan A Canty; Benjamin N Fogel; Erich K Batra; Eric W Schaefer; Jessica S Beiler; Ian M Paul Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Andrea Bizzego; Giulio Gabrieli; Marc H Bornstein; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Jennifer E Lansford; Robert H Bradley; Megan Costa; Gianluca Esposito Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kátia M A Ngale; Iná S Santos; David A González-Chica; Aluísio J D de Barros; Alicia Matijasevich Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.710