Literature DB >> 19489673

Mid-term functional outcome of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study of 40 consecutive cases.

Stephane V Berdah1, Rémi Bon Mardion, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Marc Barthet, Pierre Orsoni, Vincent Moutardier, Christian Brunet.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This prospective study aimed to analyze the functional outcome after a two-stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1999 to May 2008, 68 consecutive two-stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomies with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were performed (ulcerative colitis: n = 61; familial adenomatous polyposis: n = 7). A covering ileostomy was used in all patients. Forty patients whose covering ileostomy had been closed for a minimum of 2 years were included in this series.
RESULTS: Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 4 of 40 patients (10%). Thirteen postoperative complications occurred in 13 of 40 patients (30%). At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 26-90), the median number of bowel movements was 4 per 24 hours (range, 2-10); 15 patients (38%) had no nighttime bowel movements. None of the patients had fecal incontinence or urgency. Thirty-four of the 40 patients (85%) experienced no soiling. Seven patients (18%) took regular antidiarrheal medication. All patients were able to resume all activities practiced prior to illness onset, and 36 of 40 (90%) were satisfied with their overall quality of life (very good or good).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis provides satisfying mid-term functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19489673     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Luca Stocchi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanne A L Bartels; Malaika S Vlug; Dirk T Ubbink; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Case-Matched Comparison of Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Olga A Lavryk; Luca Stocchi; Jean H Ashburn; Meagan Costedio; Emre Gorgun; Tracy L Hull; Hermann Kessler; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Current management of intestinal bowel disease: the role of surgery.

Authors:  Gaspare Solina; Stefano Mandalà; Camillo La Barbera; Vincenzo Mandalà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-11

Review 5.  Recent results of laparoscopic surgery in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Hermann Kessler; Jonas Mudter; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure in patients undergoing elective restorative proctocolectomy (LapConPouch Trial)-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Serin Schiessling; Christine Leowardi; Peter Kienle; Dalibor Antolovic; Phillip Knebel; Thomas Bruckner; Martina Kadmon; Christoph M Seiler; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in 588 patients undergoing minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  S-J Baek; E J Dozois; K L Mathis; A L Lightner; S Y Boostrom; R R Cima; J H Pemberton; D W Larson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Laparoscopic pouch surgery in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Anil K Hemandas; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.