| Literature DB >> 19489410 |
Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury1, Anisuddin Ahmed, Nahid Kalim, Marge Koblinsky.
Abstract
Bangladesh is distinct among developing countries in achieving a low maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 322 per 100,000 livebirths despite the very low use of skilled care at delivery (13% nationally). This variation has also been observed in Matlab, a rural area in Bangladesh, where longitudinal data on maternal mortality are available since the mid-1970s. The current study investigated the possible causes of the maternal mortality decline in Matlab. The study analyzed 769 maternal deaths and 215,779 pregnancy records from the Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) and other sources of safe motherhood data in the ICDDR,B and government service areas in Matlab during 1976-2005. The major interventions that took place in both the areas since the early 1980s were the family-planning programme plus safe menstrual regulation services and safe motherhood interventions (midwives for normal delivery in the ICDDR,B service area from the late 1980s and equal access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care [EmOC] in public facilities for women from both the areas). National programmes for social development and empowerment of women through education and microcredit programmes were implemented in both the areas. The quantitative findings were supplemented by a qualitative study by interviewing local community care providers for their change in practices for maternal healthcare over time. After the introduction of the safe motherhood programme, reduction in maternal mortality was higher in the ICDDR,B service area (68.6%) than in the government service area (50.4%) during 1986-1989 and 2001-2005. Reduction in the number of maternal deaths due to the fertility decline was higher in the government service area (30%) than in the ICDDR,B service area (23%) during 1979-2005. In each area, there has been substantial reduction in abortion-related mortality--86.7% and 78.3%--in the ICDDR,B and government service areas respectively. Education of women was a strong predictor of the maternal mortality decline in both the areas. Possible explanations for the maternal mortality decline in Matlab are: better access to comprehensive EmOC services, reduction in the total fertility rate, and improved education of women. To achieve the Millenium Development Goal 5 targets, policies that bring further improved comprehensive EmOC, strengthened family-planning services, and expanded education of females are essential.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19489410 PMCID: PMC2761779 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i2.3325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Type and timing of interventions in Matlab ICDDR,B and government service areas, 1976-2005 (3)
| Interventions | ICDDR,B service area | Government service area |
|---|---|---|
| Contraceptives | Introduced in 1978 by ICDDR,B, intensified over time. The total fertility rate declined from 4.5 in 1978 to 2.7 in 2005 | Introduced in the late 1970s by the Government, intensified over time. The total fertility rate declined from 5.5 in 1978 to 2.8 in 2005 |
| Menstrual regulation | Introduced in the late 1970s by government service providers | Introduced in the late 1970s by government service providers |
| Antenatal screening | Simple screening tool introduced in 1982 (community health workers), continues today | Not available |
| Training of TBAs | ICDDR,B trained TBAs during 1982-1999. The programme stopped in 2000 | The Government trained TBAs during 1982-1999. The programme stopped in 2000 |
| Access to skilled attendants | Four midwives posted in half of the area in 1987, expanded to full area in 1990, continues today with 8 midwives. During 1987-2005, the proportion of births with a skilled attendant increased from 5.0% to 53.0% | No midwives are practising in the area. During 1987-2005, the percentage of births with a skilled attendant increased from 2.3% to 14.2% |
| Access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care (EmOC) | Most women go to Chandpur town where there were two comprehensive EmOC hospitals during 1976-1990. The number of private clinics offering com prehensive EmOC increased dramatically in the 1990s. From 1987 onwards, ICDDR,B offered free transport for women to go to Chandpur. The caesarean rate increased from 0.2% in 1990 to 6.8% in 2005. During 1990-2001, the percentage of births with a caesarean section to save the mother's life rose from 0.3% to 0.9% | Most women go to Chandpur town where there were two comprehensive EmOC hospitals during 1976-1990. The number of private clinics offering comprehensive EmOC increased dramatically in the 1990s. The caesarean rate increased from 0.1% in 1990 to 4.2% in 2005. During 1990-2001, the percentage of births with a caesarean section to save the mother's life rose from 0.1% to 0.3% |
| Availability of antibiotics | Widely available in villages since the mid-1980s | Widely available in villages since the mid-1980s |
| Microcredit programmes | Introduced in the mid-1980s, ongoing | Introduced in the mid-1980s, ongoing |
| Education of women | The proportion of pregnant women without formal schooling decreased from 69% in 1976-1980 to 27% in 2001-2005 | The proportion of pregnant women without formal schooling decreased from 73% in 1976-1980 to 28% in 2001-2005 |
| Socioeconomic development | The major changes over the full period. The proportion of pregnant women classified as poor decreased from 31% in 1976-1980 to 1% in 2001-2005 | The major changes over the full period. The proportion of pregnant women classified as poor decreased from 34% in 1976-1980 to 1% in 2001-2005 |
EmOC=Emergency obstetric care; MR=Menstrual regulation; TBAs=Traditional birth attendants
Reprinted (with minor modifications) from The Lancet (V. 370, 2007:1321). Chowdhury ME, Bot lero R, Koblinsky M, Saha SK, Dieltiens G, Ronsmans C. Determinants of reduction in maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: a 30-year cohort study, with permission from Elsevier
Trends in maternal deaths during 1976-2005 in Matlab, pre- and post-introduction of the safe motherhood intervention in ICDDR,B service area
| Time period | ICDDR,B service area | Government service area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of pregnancies | Maternal deaths per 100,000 pregnancies | No. of pregnancies | Maternal deaths per 100,000 pregnancies | |||||
| Before safe motherhood intervention | ||||||||
| 1976-1980 | 18,919 | 412.3(78) | 21,042 | 451.5 (95) | ||||
| 1981-1985 | 18,113 | 414.1 (75) | 22,170 | 505.2 (112) | ||||
| 1986-1989 | 14,131 | 417.5 (59) | 17,112 | 414.9 (71) | ||||
| After safe motherhood intervention | ||||||||
| 1990-1995 | 18,126 | 281.4 (51) | 21,832 | 361.9 (79) | ||||
| 1996-2000 | 14,573 | 233.3 (34) | 16,716 | 353.0 (59) | ||||
| 2001-2005 | 16,035 | 131.0 (21) | 17,010 | 205.8 (35) | ||||
Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of deaths
Maternal mortality in ICDDR,B service area by year of birth and the highest level of care at time of labour and delivery, 1987-2005
| Year of birth and level of care | Maternal mortality | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal deaths per 100,000 pregnancies (no. of deaths) | Crude odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
| Year of birth | |||
| 1987-1991 | 394 (66) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 1992-1996 | 365 (53) | 0.93 (0.64-1.33) | 0.84 (0.57-1.23) |
| 1997-2001 | 219 (33) | 0.55 (0.36-0.84) | 0.51 (0.32-0.81) |
| 2002-2005 | 163 (21) | 0.41 (0.25-0.67) | 0.22 (0.12-0.40) |
| Highest level of care at time of labour and delivery | |||
| No professional care | 160 (73) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Basic EmOC and referral | 521 (62) | 3.30 (2.32-4.60) | 6.02 (4.23-8.60) |
| Comprehensive EmOC | 2,382 (38) | 15.24 (10.26-22.63) | 56.63 (36.22-88.53) |
EmOC=Emergency obstetric care
Maternal mortality ratios by types of care received among women in ICDDR,B service area in Matlab, 1987-2005
| Type of care | Mortality per 100,000 pregnancies by type of care received | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987-1991 | 1992-1996 | 1997-2001 | 2002-2005 | |||||
| Highest level of care at time of labour and delivery | ||||||||
| No professional care | 206.9 (31) | 219.1 (26) | 96.2 (11) | 67.8 (5) | ||||
| Basic EmOC and referral | 967.4 (16) | 693.0 (17) | 512.2 (17) | 267.6 (12) | ||||
| Comprehensive EmOC only | 18,811.9 (19) | 5,434.8 (10) | 1,597.4 (05) | 401.2 (4) | ||||
| Any care | 394.4 (66) | 365.4 (53) | 219.1 (33) | 163.3 (21) | ||||
Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of deaths; EmOC=Emergency obstetric care
Trends in abortion-related deaths in Matlab during 1976-2005
| Annual trend in deaths | ICDDR,B service area | Government service area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of pregnancies | Abortion-related deaths/100,000 pregnancies | No. of pregnancies | Abortion-related deaths/100,000 pregnancies | |
| 1976-1980 | 18,919 | 100.4 (19) | 21,042 | 52.3 (11) |
| 1981-1985 | 18,113 | 93.9 (17) | 22,170 | 108.3 (24) |
| 1986-1989 | 14,131 | 63.7 (9) | 17,112 | 105.2 (18) |
| 1990-1995 | 18,126 | 55.2 (10) | 21,832 | 68.7 (15) |
| 1996-2000 | 14,573 | 27.4 (4) | 16,716 | 59.8 (10) |
| 2001-2005 | 16,035 | 12.5 (2) | 17,010 | 23.5 (4) |
Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of deaths
Fig. 1.Trend in maternal death by causes in ICDDR,B and government service areas during 1976-2005 in Matlab
Fig. 2.Trends in direct obstetric mortality in ICDDR,B and government service areas by cause in Matlab 1976-2005
Fig. 3.Causes of maternal deaths in Matlab by area during 1996-2005
Change in sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women in Matlab during 1976-2005
| Sociodemographic characteristics | % of pregnant women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976-1985 | 1986-1995 | 1996-2005 | Total | |
| (n=80,244) | (n=71,201) | (n=64,334) | (n=215,779) | |
| Completed years of schooling | ||||
| 0 | 68.2 | 59.3 | 35.8 | 55.6 |
| 1-4 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 12.5 | 12.1 |
| 5-7 | 13.6 | 16.8 | 25.5 | 18.2 |
| ≥8 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 24.4 | 10.8 |
| Unknown | 3.2 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 3.4 |
| Household asset quintile | ||||
| Poorest | 30.6 | 19.7 | 2.1 | 18.5 |
| Poorer | 25.1 | 22.8 | 9.5 | 19.7 |
| Poor | 20.1 | 18.2 | 14.1 | 17.7 |
| Less | 15.9 | 18.6 | 21.9 | 18.6 |
| Least | 5.1 | 13.0 | 41.6 | 18.6 |
| Unknown | 3.3 | 7.7 | 10.8 | 7.0 |
| Pregnancy order | ||||
| 1 | 21.1 | 22.1 | 27.8 | 23.4 |
| 2-3 | 31.5 | 34.4 | 40.5 | 35.1 |
| 4-5 | 21.5 | 22.4 | 20.3 | 21.4 |
| ≥6 | 25.9 | 21.2 | 11.5 | 20.1 |
| Maternal age (years) | ||||
| ≤19 | 20.9 | 12.2 | 11.1 | 15.1 |
| 20-29 | 50.7 | 62.3 | 57.3 | 56.5 |
| 30-39 | 25.0 | 22.4 | 28.9 | 25.3 |
| ≥40 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.1 |
Variation in maternal death by maternal education and household asset quintile, Matlab, 1976-2005
| Socioeonomic characteris | 1976-1985 | 1986-1995 | 1996-2005 | 1976-1985 and 1996-2005 % declined | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Maternal deaths/100,000 pregnancies | No. | Maternal deaths/100,000 pregnancies | No. | Maternal deaths/100,000 pregnancies | |||
| Completed years of schooling | ||||||||
| 0 | 54,712 | 515.4 | 42,229 | 435.7 | 23,008 | 326.0 | 36.7 | |
| 1-4 | 9,739 | 328.6 | 8,282 | 362.2 | 8,051 | 385.0 | -17.1 | |
| 5-7 | 10,882 | 312.4 | 11,944 | 259.5 | 16,428 | 146.1 | 53.2 | |
| ≥8 | 2,358 | 339.3 | 5,144 | 116.6 | 15,718 | 114.5 | 66.2 | |
| Unknown | 2,553 | 156.7 | 3,602 | 249.9 | 1,129 | 88.6 | - | |
| household asset quintile | ||||||||
| Poorest | 24,516 | 489.5 | 14,014 | 413.9 | 1,337 | 224.4 | 54.1 | |
| Poorer | 20,099 | 457.7 | 16,254 | 375.3 | 6,107 | 327.5 | 28.4 | |
| Poor | 16,139 | 458.5 | 12,972 | 462.5 | 9,059 | 242.9 | 47.0 | |
| Less poor | 12,753 | 376.4 | 13,236 | 309.8 | 14,117 | 255.0 | 32.2 | |
| Least poor | 4,108 | 389.5 | 9,227 | 238.4 | 26,781 | 190.4 | 51.1 | |
| Unknown | 2,629 | 380.4 | 5,498 | 327.4 | 6,933 | 245.2 | - | |
Fig. 4.Mean birth-spacing (months) for birth-to-pregnancy interval of mother over time in Matlab, Bangladesh
Odds ratios of maternal deaths for birth–to-pregnancy interval during 1976-2005 in Matlab, Bangladesh
| Birth-spacing | Maternal deaths/100,000 pregnancies | Crude OR (95% CI) | Aadjusted OR |
|---|---|---|---|
| First pregnancy (years) | 477.4 | 2.30 (1.78-2.90) | 3.23 (2.46-4.24) |
| ≤1 | 243.3 | 1.20 (0.84-1.60) | 1.24 (0.89-1.70) |
| 1-2 | 210.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2-3 | 235.3 | 1.12 (0.82-1.52) | 1.14 (0.83-1.55) |
| 3-4 | 228.1 | 1.10 (0.74-1.60) | 1.20 (0.80-1.72) |
| >4 | 283.4 | 1.35 (0.97-1.90) | 1.41 (1.00-1.97) |
| Unknown | 792.9 | 3.80 (2.95-4.90) | 3.80 (2.89-4.90) |
∗Adjusted for the study areas, maternal age; CI=Confidence interval; OR=Odds ratio
Fig. 5.Distribution of maternal age (years) at first-order pregnancy during 1976-2005
Fig. 6.Trend in maternal deaths by maternal age, Matlab, 1976-2005
Fig. 7.Trend in maternal deaths by pregnancy order, Matlab, 1976-2005
Fig. 8.Effect of fertility on reduction in maternal deaths by areas, 1979-2005
Trends in lifetime risk of maternal mortality by area, Matlab, 1978-2005
| Year | Estimated MMR (per 100,000 livebirths) | Total fertility rate | LTR of maternal deaths (as odds) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICDDR,B service area | |||
| 1978-1980 | 452.20 | 4.75 | 1 in 41 |
| 1981-1985 | 457.18 | 4.48 | 1 in 43 |
| 1986-1990 | 425.42 | 3.77 | 1 in 55 |
| 1991-1995 | 321.38 | 2.97 | 1 in 92 |
| 1996-2000 | 258.10 | 2.86 | 1 in 119 |
| 2001-2005 | 150.73 | 2.99 | 1 in 195 |
| Government service area | |||
| 1978-1980 | 579.43 | 6.27 | 1 in 24 |
| 1981-1985 | 568.15 | 5.85 | 1 in 26 |
| 1986-1990 | 427.78 | 5.22 | 1 in 39 |
| 1991-1995 | 450.80 | 3.89 | 1 in 49 |
| 1996-2000 | 407.37 | 3.48 | 1 in 61 |
| 2001-2005 | 247.37 | 3.18 | 1 in 109 |
∗ LTR=1-(1-MMR)PW∗TFR, where MMR is expressed as a decimal. Pregnancy wastages of 14% and 17% in the ICDDR,B and the government service area were considered to adjust for pregnancies not ending in livebirths; LTR=Lifetime risk; MMR=Maternal mortality ratio; PW=Pregnancy wastage; TFR=Total fertility rate
Percentageage of mothers referred for and admitted to a comprehensive EmOC facility outside the ICDDR,B service area
| Year | No. | Referred (%) | No. | Admitted, facility outside ICDDR,B (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 3,214 | 7.5 | 240 | 40.0 |
| 2004 | 2,716 | 6.4 | 174 | 58.0 |
| 2005 | 2,644 | 7.5 | 197 | 57.9 |
Fig. 9.Contraceptive-use rate among married women in ICDDR,B surveillance sites, 1984-2005
Fig. 10.Abortion ratios among married women of reproductive age in ICDDR,B and government service areas, 1978-2005