Literature DB >> 19488767

Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes.

Wah-Siew Tan1, Min-Hoe Chew, Boon-Swee Ooi, Kheng-Hong Ng, Jit-Fong Lim, Kok-Sun Ho, Choong-Leong Tang, Kong-Weng Eu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is increasingly becoming the gold standard for colorectal resections. While laparoscopic surgery of the left colon and rectum has been evaluated in many studies, laparoscopic resection of the right colon has not been as widely examined. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic right hemicolectomies and to determine if they were superior when compared with those after open resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed between May 2005 and December 2007, in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, were compared with a matched series of patients who underwent open surgery.
RESULTS: From a total of 37 laparoscopic cases, 36 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies. There was one conversion, giving a conversion rate of 2.7%. These 37 patients were compared with 40 patients who underwent open right hemicolectomies. The laparoscopic arm was characterised by shorter length of incisions (5.7 vs. 11.2 cm, p < 0.001) but longer operating times (110.8 vs. 71.6 min, p < 0.001). Mean number of lymph nodes harvested and length of proximal and distal margins were similar in both groups. There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of narcotic use, recovery of bowel function, length of stay, post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomies are as feasible and safe as the open technique. They confer improved cosmesis with smaller incisions but at the expense of longer operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19488767     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0743-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; George Tomlinson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ned S Abraham; Christopher M Byrne; Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  P M Falk; R W Beart; S D Wexner; A G Thorson; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; O B Johansen; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Bo Feng; Ai-Guo Lu; Jian-Wen Li; Ming-Liang Wang; Zhi-Hai Mao; Yan-Yan Hu; Feng Dong; Wei-Guo Hu; Dong-Hua Li; Lu Zang; Yuan-Fei Peng; Bao-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Inaba; Kota Okinaga; Ryoji Fukushima; Hisae Iinuma; Takashi Ogihara; Fujio Ogawa; Kota Iwasaki; Masanao Tanaka; Hideki Yamada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Midline or transverse abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer-a randomized trial.

Authors:  P G Lindgren; S R Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted vs. transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Darin Lohsiriwat; Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul; Thawatchai Akaraviputh; Narong Lert-Akyamanee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  22 in total

1.  A comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopic, transverse, and midline right-sided colectomy.

Authors:  E Tanis; A A W van Geloven; W A Bemelman; J Wind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with transrectal extraction of the colon and ileorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Ziad T Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a preliminary experience in 32 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Min-Hoe Chew; Mark Te-Ching Wong; Bernard Yon-Kuei Lim; Kheng-Hong Ng; Kong-Weng Eu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Valentina Ferri; Federica Gonella; Roberto Cirocchi; Mario Morino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Min-Hoe Chew; Mei-Huan Chang; Wah-Siew Tan; Mark Te-Ching Wong; Choong-Leong Tang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intraoperative localization of occult colorectal tumors during laparoscopic surgery by magnetic ring markers-a pilot study.

Authors:  Peter Warnick; Sascha S Chopra; Matthias Raubach; Sören Kneif; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Francesco Stipa; Antonio Burza; Rosanna Curinga; Ettore Santini; Pietro Delle Site; Riccardo Avantifiori; Marcello Picchio
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI).

Authors:  Noelia Ibáñez; Jesús Abrisqueta; Juan Luján; Quiteria Hernández; María Dolores Rufete; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer--a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jimmy Chak-Man Li; Ka Lau Leung; Simon Siu-Man Ng; Shirley Yuk-Wa Liu; Janet Fung-Yee Lee; Sophie Sok-Fei Hon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.

Authors:  M Zimmermann; C Benecke; C Jung; M Hoffmann; J Nolde; E Schlöricke; H P Bruch; T Keck; T Laubert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.