Literature DB >> 19487922

Concurrent validity of administering the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument by interview.

Yuchi Young1, Ming-Yu Fan, J Richard Hebel, Chad Boult.   

Abstract

In this study, we measure the concurrent validity of administering the Functional Independence Measure instrument by interview. Data from 28 community-dwelling, cognitively intact, elderly patients with hip fracture were collected in 5 postacute rehabilitation facilities. Within 72 hrs of admission to (and at discharge from) the postacute facilities, both a Functional Independence Measure-certified interviewer and a multidisciplinary team administered the Functional Independence Measure instrument to each participant concurrently. At admission, the mean Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by the interviewer and by the team were 84.3 and 80.5, respectively (P < 0.001). At discharge, the mean Functional Independence Measure ratings were 104.4 and 103.4 (P > 0.50), reflecting the participants' functional recovery during postacute rehabilitation. The intraclass correlation between the Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by the interviewer and by the team was 0.74 (95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.91) at admission and 0.76 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.92) at discharge. Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by Functional Independence Measure-certified interviewers are valid indicators of the functional status of groups of older people recovering from hip fracture and feasible for longitudinal study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487922      PMCID: PMC2966385          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a9f1d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  23 in total

1.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation.

Authors:  R A Keith; C V Granger; B B Hamilton; F S Sherwin
Journal:  Adv Clin Rehabil       Date:  1987

2.  Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C V Granger; A C Cotter; B B Hamilton; R C Fiedler; M M Hens
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Predicting hours of care needed.

Authors:  P B Disler; C W Roy; B P Smith
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure.

Authors:  Y Daving; E Andrén; L Nordholm; G Grimby
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Functional outcome in children with traumatic brain injury. Agreement between clinical judgment and the functional independence measure.

Authors:  C Di Scala; C C Grant; M M Brooke; B M Gans
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke.

Authors:  C V Granger; A C Cotter; B B Hamilton; R C Fiedler
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton; J M Linacre; A W Heinemann; B D Wright
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  [Functional Independence Measure as a predictor of expected rehabilitation outcome in patients with total endoprosthesis replacement and after apoplectic infarct].

Authors:  L Weh; J F Ramb
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

10.  Factors affecting short-term rehabilitation outcomes of disabled elderly patients with proximal hip fracture.

Authors:  Avital Hershkovitz; Zulicha Kalandariov; Vered Hermush; Roni Weiss; Shai Brill
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  6 in total

1.  Examining heterogeneity of functional recovery among older adults with hip fractures.

Authors:  Yuchi Young; Kuangnan Xiong; Robert M Pruzek; Larry J Brant
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  Interview Functional Independence Measure score: self-reporting as a simpler alternative to multidisciplinary functional assessment.

Authors:  Shaji Jose Vadassery; Keng He Kong; Wai Mun Lorraine Ho; Aruni Seneviratna
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Scheduled analgesic regimen improves rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Raymond Ping-Hong Chin; Chin-Hung Ho; Lydia Po-Chee Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  IS FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME BETTER AFTER ARTHROPLASTY FOR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN OLDER ADULTS?

Authors:  Alper Öztürk; Serkan Iltar; Kadir Bahadir Alemdaroğlu; Veysel Ercan Dinçel; Ahmet Özmeriç; Burak Gökgöz
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Functional recovery following hospitalisation of patients diagnosed with COVID-19: a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Julie C Reid; Andrew P Costa; MyLinh Duong; Terence Ho; Rebecca Kruisselbrink; Parminder Raina; Renata Kirkwood; Aaron Jones; Sophie Corriveau; Lauren E Griffith; Shariq Haider; Maura Marcucci; Maureen Markle-Reid; Hope Morrison; Natya Raghavan; Connie Schumacher; Brenda Vrkljan; Mats Junek; Leslie Martin; Ameen Patel; Carla Girolametto; Tyler Pitre; Marla K Beauchamp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Evaluation of treatment in the Smart Home IRIS in terms of functional independence and occupational performance and satisfaction.

Authors:  Julija Ocepek; Anne E K Roberts; Gaj Vidmar
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.