OBJECTIVES: To monitor HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in a well defined urban area with large access to antiretroviral therapy and to assess the potential source of infection of newly diagnosed HIV individuals. METHODS: All individuals resident in Geneva, Switzerland, with a newly diagnosed HIV infection between 2000 and 2008 were screened for HIV resistance. An infection was considered as recent when the positive test followed a negative screening test within less than 1 year. Phylogenetic analyses were performed by using the maximum likelihood method on pol sequences including 1058 individuals with chronic infection living in Geneva. RESULTS: Of 637 individuals with newly diagnosed HIV infection, 20% had a recent infection. Mutations associated with resistance to at least one drug class were detected in 8.5% [nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 6.3%; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 3.5%; protease inhibitors, 1.9%]. TDR (P-trend = 0.015) and, in particular, NNRTI resistance (P = 0.002) increased from 2000 to 2008. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that 34.9% of newly diagnosed individuals, and 52.7% of those with recent infection were linked to transmission clusters. Clusters were more frequent in individuals with TDR than in those with sensitive strains (59.3 vs. 32.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Moreover, 84% of newly diagnosed individuals with TDR were part of clusters composed of only newly diagnosed individuals. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the HIV transmission networks using phylogenetic analysis shows that newly diagnosed HIV infections are a significant source of onward transmission, particularly of resistant strains, thus suggesting an important self-fueling mechanism for TDR.
OBJECTIVES: To monitor HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in a well defined urban area with large access to antiretroviral therapy and to assess the potential source of infection of newly diagnosed HIV individuals. METHODS: All individuals resident in Geneva, Switzerland, with a newly diagnosed HIV infection between 2000 and 2008 were screened for HIV resistance. An infection was considered as recent when the positive test followed a negative screening test within less than 1 year. Phylogenetic analyses were performed by using the maximum likelihood method on pol sequences including 1058 individuals with chronic infection living in Geneva. RESULTS: Of 637 individuals with newly diagnosed HIV infection, 20% had a recent infection. Mutations associated with resistance to at least one drug class were detected in 8.5% [nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 6.3%; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 3.5%; protease inhibitors, 1.9%]. TDR (P-trend = 0.015) and, in particular, NNRTI resistance (P = 0.002) increased from 2000 to 2008. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that 34.9% of newly diagnosed individuals, and 52.7% of those with recent infection were linked to transmission clusters. Clusters were more frequent in individuals with TDR than in those with sensitive strains (59.3 vs. 32.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Moreover, 84% of newly diagnosed individuals with TDR were part of clusters composed of only newly diagnosed individuals. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the HIV transmission networks using phylogenetic analysis shows that newly diagnosed HIV infections are a significant source of onward transmission, particularly of resistant strains, thus suggesting an important self-fueling mechanism for TDR.
Authors: Philip A Chan; Shahzeb Kazi; Amaad Rana; Ilyse Blazar; Colette C Dejong; Kenneth H Mayer; Thomas K Huard; Kim Carleton; Fizza Gillani; Nicole Alexander; Zoanne Parillo; Timothy P Flanigan; Rami Kantor Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jessica R Keys; Shuntai Zhou; Jeffrey A Anderson; Joseph J Eron; Lauren A Rackoff; Cassandra Jabara; Ronald Swanstrom Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Stéphane Hué; Christopher B Hurt; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph Sebastian; Deenan Pillay; Joseph J Eron Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ethan Morgan; Alexandra M Oster; Stephanie Townsell; Donna Peace; Nanette Benbow; John A Schneider Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Ivana Grgic; Snjezana Zidovec Lepej; Maja M Lunar; Mario Poljak; Adriana Vince; Ivana Baca Vrakela; Ana Planinic; Katja Seme; Josip Begovac Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Julie F Weis; Jared M Baeten; Connor O McCoy; Chris Warth; Deborah Donnell; Katherine K Thomas; Craig W Hendrix; Mark A Marzinke; Nelly Mugo; Frederick A Matsen; Connie Celum; Dara A Lehman Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177