Literature DB >> 19487826

Effects of upper extremity neural mobilization on thermal pain sensitivity: a sham-controlled study in asymptomatic participants.

Jason M Beneciuk1, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A single-blinded, quasi-experimental, within- and between-sessions assessment.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential mechanisms of neural mobilization (NM), using tensioning techniques in comparison to sham NM on a group of asymptomatic volunteers between the ages of 18 and 50.
BACKGROUND: NM utilizing tensioning techniques is used by physical therapists in the treatment of patients with cervical and/or upper extremity symptoms. The underlying mechanisms of potential benefits associated with NM tensioning techniques are unknown. METHODS AND MEASURES: Participants (n = 62) received either a NM or sham NM intervention 2 to 3 times a week for a total of 9 sessions, followed by a 1-week period of no intervention to assess carryover effects. A-delta (first pain response) and C-fiber (temporal summation) mediated pain perceptions were tested via thermal quantitative sensory testing procedures. Elbow extension range of motion (ROM) and sensory descriptor ratings were obtained during a neurodynamic test for the median nerve. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: No group differences were seen for A-delta mediated pain perception at either immediate or carryover times. Group differences were identified for immediate C-fiber mediated pain perception (P = .032), in which hypoalgesia occurred for the NM group but not the sham NM group. This hypoalgesic effect was not maintained at carryover (P = .104). Group differences were also identified for the 3-week and carryover periods for elbow extension ROM (P = .004), and for the participant sensory descriptor ratings (P = .018), in which increased ROM and decreased sensory descriptor ratings were identified in participants in the NM group but not the sham NM group.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that mechanistic effects of tensioning NM differ from sham NM for asymptomatic participants. Specifically, NM resulted in immediate, but not sustained, C-fiber mediated hypoalgesia. Also, NM was associated with increased elbow ROM and a reduction in sensory descriptor ratings at 3-week and carryover assessment times. These differences provide potentially important information on the mechanistic effects of NM, as well as the description of a sham NM for use in future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487826     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  15 in total

1.  A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Kevin R Vincent; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Comparison of 2 Lumbar Manual Therapies on Temporal Summation of Pain in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Charles W Penza; Maggie E Horn; Steven Z George; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Heightened pain sensitivity in individuals with signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and the relationship to clinical outcomes following a manual therapy intervention.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Donald D Price; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2011-07-20

4.  Comparison of Two Manual Therapy Programs, including Tendon Gliding Exercises as a Common Adjunct, While Managing the Participants with Chronic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Fauzia Javed Sheereen; Bibhuti Sarkar; Pallavi Sahay; Mohammad Abu Shaphe; Ahmad H Alghadir; Amir Iqbal; Taimul Ali; Fuzail Ahmad
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.667

5.  ACUTE EFFECTS OF NEURAL GLIDING ON ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Andy Waldhelm; Marissa Gacek; Hannah Davis; Christy Saia; Brock Kirby
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07

6.  Stability of behavioral estimates of activity-dependent modulation of pain.

Authors:  Meryl J Alappattu; Mark D Bishop; Joel E Bialosky; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Acute effects of neural mobilization and infrared on the mechanics of the median nerve.

Authors:  Monara Kedma Nunes; Gabrielly Fontenele Dos Santos; Diandra Caroline Martins E Silva; Ana Cláudia Mota de Freitas; Isadora Ferreira Henriques; Peterson Marco Andrade; Dionis de Castro Machado; Silmar Teixeira; Marco Orsini Neves; Gildário Dias; Fernando Silva-Júnior; Victor Hugo Bastos
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

8.  Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling improved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Blanca Romero-Moraleda; Roy La Touche; Sergio Lerma-Lara; Raúl Ferrer-Peña; Víctor Paredes; Ana Belén Peinado; Daniel Muñoz-García
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Comparison of Dry Needling versus Orthopedic Manual Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A Single-Blind, Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Irene Campa-Moran; Etelvina Rey-Gudin; Josué Fernández-Carnero; Alba Paris-Alemany; Alfonso Gil-Martinez; Sergio Lerma Lara; Almudena Prieto-Baquero; José Luis Alonso-Perez; Roy La Touche
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2015-11-10

10.  Is pharmacologic treatment better than neural mobilization for cervicobrachial pain? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  César Calvo-Lobo; Francisco Unda-Solano; Daniel López-López; Irene Sanz-Corbalán; Carlos Romero-Morales; Patricia Palomo-López; Jesús Seco-Calvo; David Rodríguez-Sanz
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.