CONTEXT: Studies of gene-environment interplay in the development of psychiatric and substance use disorders are rapidly accumulating. However, few attempts have been made to integrate findings and to articulate general mechanisms of gene-environment influence in the emergence of psychopathology. OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns of gene-environment interplay between externalizing disorders (antisocial behavior and substance use) and several environmental risk factors. DESIGN: We used quantitative genetic models to examine how genetic and environmental risk for externalizing disorders changes as a function of environmental context. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the community and took part in a daylong assessment at a university laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 1315 male and female twin pairs participating in the assessment of the Minnesota Twin Family Study at age 17 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multiple measures and informants were used to construct a composite of externalizing disorders and composite measures of 6 environmental risk factors, including academic achievement and engagement, antisocial and prosocial peer affiliations, mother-child and father-child relationship problems, and stressful life events. RESULTS: A significant gene x environment interaction was detected between each environmental risk factor and externalizing such that greater environmental adversity was associated with increased genetic risk for externalizing. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of environmental adversity, genetic factors become more important in the etiology of externalizing disorders. The consistency of the results further suggests a general mechanism of environmental influence on externalizing disorders regardless of the specific form of the environmental risk.
CONTEXT: Studies of gene-environment interplay in the development of psychiatric and substance use disorders are rapidly accumulating. However, few attempts have been made to integrate findings and to articulate general mechanisms of gene-environment influence in the emergence of psychopathology. OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns of gene-environment interplay between externalizing disorders (antisocial behavior and substance use) and several environmental risk factors. DESIGN: We used quantitative genetic models to examine how genetic and environmental risk for externalizing disorders changes as a function of environmental context. SETTING:Participants were recruited from the community and took part in a daylong assessment at a university laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 1315 male and female twin pairs participating in the assessment of the Minnesota Twin Family Study at age 17 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multiple measures and informants were used to construct a composite of externalizing disorders and composite measures of 6 environmental risk factors, including academic achievement and engagement, antisocial and prosocial peer affiliations, mother-child and father-child relationship problems, and stressful life events. RESULTS: A significant gene x environment interaction was detected between each environmental risk factor and externalizing such that greater environmental adversity was associated with increased genetic risk for externalizing. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of environmental adversity, genetic factors become more important in the etiology of externalizing disorders. The consistency of the results further suggests a general mechanism of environmental influence on externalizing disorders regardless of the specific form of the environmental risk.
Authors: Joshua Breslau; Guilherme Borges; Naomi Saito; Daniel J Tancredi; Corina Benjet; Ladson Hinton; Kenneth S Kendler; Richard Kravitz; William Vega; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Maria Elena Medina-Mora Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-12
Authors: Susan K Grotewold; Vanessa L Wall; Dayton J Goodell; Cassandra Hayter; Sondra T Bland Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Kenneth A Dodge; Shawn J Latendresse; Jennifer E Lansford; John E Bates; Gregory S Pettit; John P Budde; Alison M Goate; Danielle M Dick Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 8.982