OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the questionnaire Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) compared with clinical records. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, multicenter study was performed within the framework of the Peripheral Arterial Disease Study (PERART) in 3,329 persons aged >50 years old. The sample was selected by simple random sampling in 32 primary health care centers. The diagnoses included were acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. Treatment variables were also considered (antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic agents or insulin, as well as antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents). The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and kappa index were computed to test the validity of the MONICA questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years (SD 8.9) and 54.8% were women. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was >90% for all the variables apart from angina pectoris (89.9%) and cerebrovascular disease (86.5%). Specificity was also >90%, except for angina pectoris (88.3%) and hypercholesterolemia (77.5%). The positive predictive value was >90% for all the treatments; >80% for angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction and hypertension; 79.4% for cerebrovascular disease; 79.1% for hypercholesterolemia and 73.4% for diabetes mellitus. The negative predictive value was >90% for all the variables. The kappa indexes were >0.80 for all the variables apart from hypercholesterolemia (0.69) and diabetes mellitus (0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The MONICA cardiovascular questionnaire is valid in the assessment of cardiovascular disease, risk factors and treatments in patients aged >50 years old.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the questionnaire Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) compared with clinical records. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, multicenter study was performed within the framework of the Peripheral Arterial Disease Study (PERART) in 3,329 persons aged >50 years old. The sample was selected by simple random sampling in 32 primary health care centers. The diagnoses included were acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. Treatment variables were also considered (antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic agents or insulin, as well as antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents). The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and kappa index were computed to test the validity of the MONICA questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years (SD 8.9) and 54.8% were women. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was >90% for all the variables apart from angina pectoris (89.9%) and cerebrovascular disease (86.5%). Specificity was also >90%, except for angina pectoris (88.3%) and hypercholesterolemia (77.5%). The positive predictive value was >90% for all the treatments; >80% for angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction and hypertension; 79.4% for cerebrovascular disease; 79.1% for hypercholesterolemia and 73.4% for diabetes mellitus. The negative predictive value was >90% for all the variables. The kappa indexes were >0.80 for all the variables apart from hypercholesterolemia (0.69) and diabetes mellitus (0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The MONICA cardiovascular questionnaire is valid in the assessment of cardiovascular disease, risk factors and treatments in patients aged >50 years old.
Authors: Luis Palomo; Francisco-Javier Félix-Redondo; Luis Lozano-Mera; José-Fernando Pérez-Castán; Daniel Fernández-Berges; Francisco Buitrago Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Francisco Javier Félix-Redondo; Daniel Fernández-Bergés; José Fernando Pérez; María José Zaro; Antonio García; Luis Lozano; Héctor Sanz; María Grau; Paula Alvarez-Palacios; Verónica Tejero Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Lluís Cirera; José María Huerta; María Dolores Chirlaque; Genevieve Buckland; Nerea Larrañaga; María José Sánchez; Antonio Agudo; Pilar Amiano; José Ramón Quirós; Eva Ardanaz; Larraitz Arriola; Esther Molina; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; Carlos A González; Concepción Moreno-Iribas; Carmen Navarro Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Fernando Agüero; Irene R Dégano; Isaac Subirana; Maria Grau; Alberto Zamora; Joan Sala; Rafel Ramos; Ricard Treserras; Jaume Marrugat; Roberto Elosua Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emiliano Rodríguez-Sánchez; Sara Mora-Simón; María C Patino-Alonso; Diana Pérez-Arechaederra; José I Recio-Rodríguez; Manuel A Gómez-Marcos; Luis F Valero-Juan; Luis García-Ortiz Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Cheryl Vigen; Marilyn L Kwan; Esther M John; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Theresa H M Keegan; Yani Lu; Salma Shariff-Marco; Kristine R Monroe; Allison W Kurian; Iona Cheng; Bette J Caan; Valerie S Lee; Janise M Roh; Leslie Bernstein; Richard Sposto; Anna H Wu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 2.532