BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-resistance to ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin, and fluoroquinoles has been shown in experimental studies, but information regarding its impact in the clinical setting is scarce and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess whether previous exposure to ciprofloxacin influences on the sensitivity of those antibiotics in subsequent P aeruginosa bacteremic isolates. METHODS: Patients with P aeruginosa bacteremia were recorded from a blood culture surveillance program (1997-2007). Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, setting of the infection, source of infection, previous antibiotic exposure, and antibiotic sensitivity were analyzed. RESULTS: We studied 572 cases of P aeruginosa bacteremia. There were 327 men (57.2%), and the mean age was 61.2 +/- 18 years. The bacteremia was nosocomial in 62.4% of episodes. Resistance rates of P aeruginosa isolates were 15.5% for ceftazidime, 16.7% for imipenem, 11.2% for meropenem, 12.3% for piperacillin-tazobactam, and 23.1% for ciprofloxacin. Exposure to ciprofloxacin during the previous 30 days was an independent predictor of resistance to ceftazidime (odds ratio [OR], 3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.3; P < .001), imipenem (OR, 2; 95% CI: 1.1-3.7; P = .02), meropenem (OR, 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4-5.3; P = .004), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.7; P = .007), ciprofloxacin (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7-4.9; P < .001), and multidrug resistance (OR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.2; P = .02). CONCLUSION: P aeruginosa bacteremic isolates from patients who have been exposed to ciprofloxacin during the 30 days prior to the development of bacteremia have an increased risk of being resistant to ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, or ciprofloxacin and to have multidrug resistance.
BACKGROUND:Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-resistance to ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin, and fluoroquinoles has been shown in experimental studies, but information regarding its impact in the clinical setting is scarce and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess whether previous exposure to ciprofloxacin influences on the sensitivity of those antibiotics in subsequent P aeruginosa bacteremic isolates. METHODS:Patients with P aeruginosa bacteremia were recorded from a blood culture surveillance program (1997-2007). Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, setting of the infection, source of infection, previous antibiotic exposure, and antibiotic sensitivity were analyzed. RESULTS: We studied 572 cases of P aeruginosa bacteremia. There were 327 men (57.2%), and the mean age was 61.2 +/- 18 years. The bacteremia was nosocomial in 62.4% of episodes. Resistance rates of P aeruginosa isolates were 15.5% for ceftazidime, 16.7% for imipenem, 11.2% for meropenem, 12.3% for piperacillin-tazobactam, and 23.1% for ciprofloxacin. Exposure to ciprofloxacin during the previous 30 days was an independent predictor of resistance to ceftazidime (odds ratio [OR], 3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.3; P < .001), imipenem (OR, 2; 95% CI: 1.1-3.7; P = .02), meropenem (OR, 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4-5.3; P = .004), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.7; P = .007), ciprofloxacin (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7-4.9; P < .001), and multidrug resistance (OR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.2; P = .02). CONCLUSION:P aeruginosa bacteremic isolates from patients who have been exposed to ciprofloxacin during the 30 days prior to the development of bacteremia have an increased risk of being resistant to ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, or ciprofloxacin and to have multidrug resistance.
Authors: C Peña; S Gómez-Zorrilla; C Suarez; M A Dominguez; F Tubau; O Arch; A Oliver; M Pujol; J Ariza Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Natalija Karabasevic; Jason A Roberts; Luke Stronach; Saiyuri Naicker; Steven C Wallis; Fredrik Sjövall; Fekade Sime Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Diana Averbuch; Christina Orasch; Catherine Cordonnier; David M Livermore; Malgorzata Mikulska; Claudio Viscoli; Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; Galina Klyasova; Oscar Marchetti; Dan Engelhard; Murat Akova Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Y Muraki; M Kitamura; Y Maeda; T Kitahara; T Mori; H Ikeue; M Tsugita; K Tadano; K Takada; T Akamatsu; T Yamada; T Yamada; T Shiraishi; M Okuda Journal: Infection Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Morgan Hakki; Romney M Humphries; Peera Hemarajata; Gregory B Tallman; Ryan K Shields; Roberta T Mettus; Yohei Doi; James S Lewis Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ioannis A Bliziotis; Nicola Petrosillo; Argyris Michalopoulos; George Samonis; Matthew E Falagas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros; Mar Solé; Pedro Castro; Jorge Luis Torres; Cristina Hernández; Mariano Rinaudo; Sara Fernández; Álex Soriano; José María Nicolás; Josep Mensa; Jordi Vila; José Antonio Martínez Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 9.097