OBJECTIVE: Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are associated with metabolic abnormalities, but little is known about their impact on hypertension. We conducted this study to determine the associations of lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy with hypertension. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients who completed a self-report body morphology assessment was performed. We defined hypertension as a clinical diagnosis, or a mean systolic blood pressure (BP) > 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > 90 mmHg in the previous 6 months. We used logistic regression to examine the association between hypertension and body morphology. RESULTS: Among 347 patients, there were 2278 BP readings in 6 months. In adjusted analyses, patients with moderate lipoatrophy [odds ratio (OR) 4.3; P = 0.03] or moderate lipohypertrophy (OR 4.3; P = 0.006) had four times the odds, and patients with mild lipohypertrophy (OR 2.3; P = 0.03) had twice the odds of having hypertension compared with patients without changes. We hypothesized that the impact of lipohypertrophy on hypertension was mediated, in part, through body mass index (BMI). When BMI was included in the analysis, increased BMI was significantly associated with hypertension (OR = 1.1; P < 0.001 per kg/m(2)), and the association between lipohypertrophy and hypertension was no longer present. However, the association between moderate lipoatrophy and hypertension was strengthened (OR = 5.5; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension and there is a dose-response effect with more severe lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy. The association between lipohypertrophy (but not lipoatrophy) and hypertension appears to be mediated by BMI. Our results suggest that patient-based body morphology assessments are related to hypertension and may have potential implications for cardiovascular disease.
OBJECTIVE: Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are associated with metabolic abnormalities, but little is known about their impact on hypertension. We conducted this study to determine the associations of lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy with hypertension. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of HIV-infectedpatients who completed a self-report body morphology assessment was performed. We defined hypertension as a clinical diagnosis, or a mean systolic blood pressure (BP) > 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > 90 mmHg in the previous 6 months. We used logistic regression to examine the association between hypertension and body morphology. RESULTS: Among 347 patients, there were 2278 BP readings in 6 months. In adjusted analyses, patients with moderate lipoatrophy [odds ratio (OR) 4.3; P = 0.03] or moderate lipohypertrophy (OR 4.3; P = 0.006) had four times the odds, and patients with mild lipohypertrophy (OR 2.3; P = 0.03) had twice the odds of having hypertension compared with patients without changes. We hypothesized that the impact of lipohypertrophy on hypertension was mediated, in part, through body mass index (BMI). When BMI was included in the analysis, increased BMI was significantly associated with hypertension (OR = 1.1; P < 0.001 per kg/m(2)), and the association between lipohypertrophy and hypertension was no longer present. However, the association between moderate lipoatrophy and hypertension was strengthened (OR = 5.5; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension and there is a dose-response effect with more severe lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy. The association between lipohypertrophy (but not lipoatrophy) and hypertension appears to be mediated by BMI. Our results suggest that patient-based body morphology assessments are related to hypertension and may have potential implications for cardiovascular disease.
Authors: T Saint-Marc; M Partisani; I Poizot-Martin; O Rouviere; F Bruno; R Avellaneda; J M Lang; J A Gastaut; J L Touraine Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-01-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: C Hadigan; J B Meigs; C Corcoran; P Rietschel; S Piecuch; N Basgoz; B Davis; P Sax; T Stanley; P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; S Grinspoon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: David Wohl; Rebecca Scherzer; Steven Heymsfield; Michael Simberkoff; Stephen Sidney; Peter Bacchetti; Carl Grunfeld Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Kristen R Bush; Amee J Epler; Dorcas J Dobie; Tania M Davis; Jennifer L Sporleder; Charles Maynard; Marcia L Burman; Daniel R Kivlahan Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-04-14
Authors: Nina Friis-Møller; Rainer Weber; Peter Reiss; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Ole Kirk; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Christian Pradier; Linda Morfeldt; Silvia Mateu; Matthew Law; Wafaa El-Sadr; Stephan De Wit; Caroline A Sabin; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-05-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Marisela Noorhasan; Daniel R Drozd; Carl Grunfeld; Joseph O Merrill; Greer A Burkholder; Michael J Mugavero; James H Willig; Amanda L Willig; Karen L Cropsey; Kenneth H Mayer; Aaron Blashill; Matthew Mimiaga; Mary E McCaul; Heidi Hutton; Geetanjali Chander; William C Mathews; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron; Katerina Christopoulos; Rob J Fredericksen; Robin M Nance; Joseph Chris Delaney; Paul K Crane; Michael S Saag; Mari M Kitahata; Heidi M Crane Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Greer A Burkholder; Ashutosh R Tamhane; Monika M Safford; Paul M Muntner; Amanda L Willig; James H Willig; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ingjerd W Manner; Marius Trøseid; Olav Oektedalen; Morten Baekken; Ingrid Os Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.738