Literature DB >> 19485990

The cost-effectiveness of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labour.

O Eddama1, S Petrou, L Schroeder, S S Bollapragada, F Mackenzie, J Norrie, M Reid, J E Norman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour.
DESIGN: Economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised placebo controlled trial (the IMOP trial).
SETTING: Large UK maternity hospital. POPULATION: A total of 350 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation > or = 37 weeks gestation, requiring cervical ripening prior to induction of labour.
INTERVENTIONS: Isosorbide mononitrate (n = 177) or placebo (n = 173) self-administered vaginally at home at 48, 32 and 16 hours prior to the scheduled time of admission for induction.
RESULTS: Mean health service costs between the period of randomisation and discharge for mother and infant were 1254.86 pound sterling in the IMN group and 1242.88 pound sterling in the placebo group, generating a mean cost difference of 11.98 pound sterling (bootstrap mean cost difference 12.86 pound sterling; 95%CI: -106.79 pound sterling, 129.39 pound sterling) that was not statistically significant (P = 0.842). The incremental cost per hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery was 7.53 pound sterling. At the notional willingness to pay threshold of 100 pound sterling per hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery, the probability that IMN is cost-effective was estimated at 0.67. This translated into a mean net monetary benefit of 98.13 pound sterling for each woman given IMN.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the probability that IMN is cost-effective approaches 0.7 at seemingly low willingness to pay thresholds for an hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery, our results should be viewed in the light of the clinical findings from the IMOP trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485990     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02236.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

Review 1.  Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Anthony J Kelly; Stefania Livio; Jane E Norman; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 2.  Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  Arpita Ghosh; Katherine R Lattey; Anthony J Kelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-05

3.  The impact of isosorbide mononitrate on cervical ripening and labor induction in primiparous women with term pregnancy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Hamideh Yazdizadeh; Parvin Abedi; Shahnaz Najar; Kambiz Ahmadi Angali
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-05

Review 4.  Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; E Keeney; T Dowswell; N J Welton; N Medley; S Dias; L V Jones; D M Caldwell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 5.  Reporting and Analysis of Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Authors:  Mohamed El Alili; Johanna M van Dongen; Judith A F Huirne; Maurits W van Tulder; Judith E Bosmans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Alfred O Osoti; Anthony J Kelly; Stefania Livio; Jane E Norman; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.