Literature DB >> 19485963

Outcome management in in-patient psychiatric care.

B Puschner1, D Schöfer, C Knaup, T Becker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To delineate methods and to describe patient appraisal as well as effect of outcome management in in-patient psychiatric care.
METHOD: Two hundred and ninety-four adults with mental illness receiving in-patient treatment at a psychiatric hospital in rural Bavaria gave informed consent to participate in this cluster-randomised trial. Participants were asked to provide information on treatment outcome via weekly computerised standardised assessments. Patients and clinicians in the intervention group received continuous feedback of outcome.
RESULTS: Patients were willing and able to regularly provide outcome data and valued feedback. However, use of feedback in conversations between patient and clinician was rare. Outcome management failed to impact on patient-rated outcome during in-patient treatment.
CONCLUSION: Outcome management is feasible in people receiving in-patient psychiatric care, but failed to show an overall short-term effect. Strategies need to be developed to improve active use of routinely collected treatment outcome data in mental health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  8 in total

1.  Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve the Quality of Care for Weight of Patients with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Alexander S Young; Amy N Cohen; Alison B Hamilton; Gerhard Hellemann; Christopher Reist; Fiona Whelan
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Course of health care costs before and after psychiatric inpatient treatment: patient-reported vs. administrative records.

Authors:  Nadja Zentner; Ildiko Baumgartner; Thomas Becker; Bernd Puschner
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-01-27

Review 3.  Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 4.  Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.

Authors:  Tony Kendrick; Magdy El-Gohary; Beth Stuart; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Laura Aiken; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Amy Gimson; Anna L Brütt; Kim de Jong; Michael Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 6.  Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dawid Gondek; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Elian Fink; Jessica Deighton; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

7.  The Brief Symptom Inventory and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 in the Assessment of the Outcome Quality of Mental Health Interventions.

Authors:  Aureliano Crameri; Christopher Schuetz; Andreas Andreae; Margit Koemeda; Peter Schulthess; Volker Tschuschke; Agnes von Wyl
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2016-09-08

8.  Implementation of the patient version of the evidence-based (S3) guideline for psychosocial interventions for patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Johanna Breilmann; Reinhold Kilian; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Uta Gühne; Alkomiet Hasan; Peter Falkai; Andreas Allgöwer; Rainer Muche; Thomas Becker; Klemens Ajayi; Peter Brieger; Karel Frasch; Stephan Heres; Markus Jäger; Andreas Küthmann; Albert Putzhammer; Max Schmauß; Bertram Schneeweiß; Michael Schwarz; Markus Kösters
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.