B Puschner1, D Schöfer, C Knaup, T Becker. 1. Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. bernd.puschner@bkh-guenzburg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To delineate methods and to describe patient appraisal as well as effect of outcome management in in-patient psychiatric care. METHOD: Two hundred and ninety-four adults with mental illness receiving in-patient treatment at a psychiatric hospital in rural Bavaria gave informed consent to participate in this cluster-randomised trial. Participants were asked to provide information on treatment outcome via weekly computerised standardised assessments. Patients and clinicians in the intervention group received continuous feedback of outcome. RESULTS: Patients were willing and able to regularly provide outcome data and valued feedback. However, use of feedback in conversations between patient and clinician was rare. Outcome management failed to impact on patient-rated outcome during in-patient treatment. CONCLUSION: Outcome management is feasible in people receiving in-patient psychiatric care, but failed to show an overall short-term effect. Strategies need to be developed to improve active use of routinely collected treatment outcome data in mental health care.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To delineate methods and to describe patient appraisal as well as effect of outcome management in in-patientpsychiatric care. METHOD: Two hundred and ninety-four adults with mental illness receiving in-patient treatment at a psychiatric hospital in rural Bavaria gave informed consent to participate in this cluster-randomised trial. Participants were asked to provide information on treatment outcome via weekly computerised standardised assessments. Patients and clinicians in the intervention group received continuous feedback of outcome. RESULTS:Patients were willing and able to regularly provide outcome data and valued feedback. However, use of feedback in conversations between patient and clinician was rare. Outcome management failed to impact on patient-rated outcome during in-patient treatment. CONCLUSION: Outcome management is feasible in people receiving in-patientpsychiatric care, but failed to show an overall short-term effect. Strategies need to be developed to improve active use of routinely collected treatment outcome data in mental health care.
Authors: Alexander S Young; Amy N Cohen; Alison B Hamilton; Gerhard Hellemann; Christopher Reist; Fiona Whelan Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Tony Kendrick; Magdy El-Gohary; Beth Stuart; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Laura Aiken; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Amy Gimson; Anna L Brütt; Kim de Jong; Michael Moore Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-07-13
Authors: Aureliano Crameri; Christopher Schuetz; Andreas Andreae; Margit Koemeda; Peter Schulthess; Volker Tschuschke; Agnes von Wyl Journal: Psychiatry J Date: 2016-09-08
Authors: Johanna Breilmann; Reinhold Kilian; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Uta Gühne; Alkomiet Hasan; Peter Falkai; Andreas Allgöwer; Rainer Muche; Thomas Becker; Klemens Ajayi; Peter Brieger; Karel Frasch; Stephan Heres; Markus Jäger; Andreas Küthmann; Albert Putzhammer; Max Schmauß; Bertram Schneeweiß; Michael Schwarz; Markus Kösters Journal: Trials Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 2.279