Literature DB >> 19485724

Impact of noncompliance with urate-lowering drug on serum urate and gout-related healthcare costs: administrative claims analysis.

Rachel Halpern1, Reema R Mody, Mahesh J Fuldeore, Pankaj A Patel, Ted R Mikuls.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between allopurinol compliance and serum urate (sUA) level; and examine the association between sUA and gout-related healthcare costs in a large managed care population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims analysis examined subjects with gout (> or = 2 medical claims with ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 274.xx or > or = 1 claim with a gout diagnosis and > or = 1 pharmacy claim for allopurinol, probenecid, colchicine, or sulfinpyrazone) between January 1, 2002 and March 31, 2004. Each subject was observed during 1-year pre-index and 1-year post-index periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were allopurinol medication possession ratio (MPR) and compliance (MPR > or = 0.80), sUA (mg/dL), and gout-related healthcare costs. 'Post-allopurinol' sUA was measured during three periods after the first observed allopurinol fill: 30-89 days; 90-149 days; > or = 150 days. A baseline sUA on or before the start of the post-index period was also identified. Outcomes were stratified by post-allopurinol or baseline sUA and compliance. Generalized linear modeling (GLM) regression measured the impact of baseline sUA on gout-related healthcare costs, controlling for demographic and health status variables.
RESULTS: The study sample comprised 18,243 subjects with mean age of 53.9 years. In all, 55% (n = 10,073) of subjects used allopurinol. There were 1473 (8.1%) subjects with a post-allopurinol sUA and 2438 (13.4%) subjects with a baseline sUA result. Among all subjects with a post-allopurinol sUA, 45.6% were compliant; between 49.3% and 56.8% of compliant subjects had an sUA < 6.0 mg/dL compared with 22.5-27.8% of non-compliant subjects, depending on the post-allopurinol time period (all p < 0.001). GLM results showed gout-related costs associated with baseline sUA > or = 6.0 and < 9.0 mg/dL were 58% higher (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.012 -2.456; p = 0.044) than were costs for sUA < 6.0 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in gout-related costs between baseline sUA < 6.0 mg/dL and > or = 9.0 mg/dL.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis revealed an important associations between allopurinol compliance, sUA, and gout-related costs: compliance was positively associated with favorable sUA (<6.0 mg/dL) in unadjusted comparisons. GLM showed that baseline sUA < 6.0 was inversely associated with gout-related costs relative to baseline sUA > or = 6.0 and <9.0 mg/dL. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of subjects, even compliant ones, did not achieve sUA < 6.0 mg/dL. These results should be interpreted carefully in light of study limitations, including incomplete laboratory data, the potentially incorrect inference that medications were taken as prescribed, and lack of generalizability from Medicare managed care enrollees to the broader Medicare population.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485724     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903017966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  24 in total

1.  Effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on cardiovascular disease in patients with gout: a cohort study.

Authors:  Seoyoung C Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Niteesh Choudhry; Jun Liu; Robert J Glynn; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Difficult-to-treat gouty arthritis: a disease warranting better management.

Authors:  Naomi Schlesinger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Racial differences in gout incidence in a population-based cohort: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Janet W Maynard; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Linda Kao; Allan C Gelber; Josef Coresh; Alan N Baer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The Duality of Economic Issues With Medication Non-adherence in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis.

Authors:  Natasha K J Campbell; Khalid Saadeldin; Mary A De Vera
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of the Economic and Humanistic Burden of Gout.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Stephen M Beard
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The patient's experience of gout: new insights to optimize management.

Authors:  Nicola Dalbeth; Karen Lindsay
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Improving treatment adherence in patients with rheumatologic disease.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2010-10-12

8.  Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Allopurinol in Achieving and Sustaining Target Serum Urate in a US Veterans Affairs Gout Cohort.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Shuo Yang; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 9.  Discordant American College of Physicians and international rheumatology guidelines for gout management: consensus statement of the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN).

Authors:  Nicola Dalbeth; Thomas Bardin; Michael Doherty; Frédéric Lioté; Pascal Richette; Kenneth G Saag; Alexander K So; Lisa K Stamp; Hyon K Choi; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Impact of non-adherence on the safety and efficacy of uric acid-lowering therapies in the treatment of gout.

Authors:  Daniel Hill-McManus; Elena Soto; Scott Marshall; Steven Lane; Dyfrig Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.