Literature DB >> 1948569

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

A V Persson1, R J Davis, J L Villavicencio.   

Abstract

All surgical patients are at risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism or postphlebitic syndrome. The evolution of ultrasonographic imaging has increased the awareness of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Duplex imaging and Doppler color flow imaging have made the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis relatively simple, painless, inexpensive, and definitive. These procedures have gained acceptance by both patients and physicians. Several risk factors have been identified that increase the chance of the development of deep venous thrombosis. These factors include a history of deep venous thrombosis, presence of a malignant process, increasing age, cigarette smoking, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and general anesthesia. The greater the number of risk factors, the more aggressive prophylaxis should be. Means of prophylaxis have improved, and surgeons now generally agree that some form of prophylaxis is required. Heparin and intermittent compression devices appear to be equally effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis. The addition of venous monitoring in high-risk patients permits immediate identification of the presence of deep venous thrombosis. During the last decade, the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis has changed little. Heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice. A small group of patients receive fibrinolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis. Although the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis has decreased during the last decade, it remains a significant complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1948569     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45585-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sedentary behaviour and cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Carl J Caspersen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Pulmonary embolism following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Mayol; E Vincent-Hamelin; J M Sarmiento; E O Oshiro; J Diaz-Gonzalez; F J Tamayo; J A Fernándeź-Represa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Airline chair-rest deconditioning: induction of immobilisation thromboemboli?

Authors:  John E Greenleaf; Nancy J Rehrer; Stanley R Mohler; David T Quach; David G Evans
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effect of various pneumoperitoneum pressures on femoral vein hemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ankush Sharma; Divya Dahiya; Lileswar Kaman; Vikas Saini; Arunanshu Behera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-02-05

5.  Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is not indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Blake; S I Toker; E Dunn
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Epidemiological status and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis in patients with femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Tianhua Li; Chenhao Dou; Shuhong Yang; Qian Geng; Qing Lu; Yahui Zhang; Jingjing Yu; Fang Hu; Junqin Ding
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.