| Literature DB >> 19485673 |
Stéphane Vautier1, Steffi Pohl.
Abstract
Balanced scales, that is, scales based on items whose content is either negatively or positively polarized, are often used in the hope of measuring a bipolar construct. Research has shown that usually balanced scales do not yield 1-dimensional measurements. This threatens their construct validity. The authors show how to test bipolarity while accounting for method effects. This is demonstrated on a data set of state and trait anxiety measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; C. D. Spielberger, R. L. Gorsuch, R. Lushene, P. R. Vagg, & G. A. Jacobs, 1983) scales. Taking a test-retest perspective, assuming temporally stable method effects, the authors tested the bipolarity of the temporal change through suitable constraints specified in a structural equation model adapted from S. Vautier, R. Steyer, and A. Boomsma (2008). The model fit the data closely, chi(2)(13, N = 888) = 20.75, p = .07. Thus, the state and trait scales seem to measure bipolar constructs plus temporally stable method effects. Parameter estimates suggest reliable change scores for the state anxiety scale (rho = .90) and specific method effects for the state and trait scales of the STAI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19485673 DOI: 10.1037/a0015312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Assess ISSN: 1040-3590