Literature DB >> 19485621

Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays.

Yoel Inbar1, David A Pizarro, Joshua Knobe, Paul Bloom.   

Abstract

Two studies demonstrate that a dispositional proneness to disgust ("disgust sensitivity") is associated with intuitive disapproval of gay people. Study 1 was based on previous research showing that people are more likely to describe a behavior as intentional when they see it as morally wrong (see Knobe, 2006, for a review). As predicted, the more disgust sensitive participants were, the more likely they were to describe an agent whose behavior had the side effect of causing gay men to kiss in public as having intentionally encouraged gay men to kiss publicly-even though most participants did not explicitly think it wrong to encourage gay men to kiss in public. No such effect occurred when subjects were asked about heterosexual kissing. Study 2 used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2006) as a dependent measure. The more disgust sensitive participants were, the more they showed unfavorable automatic associations with gay people as opposed to heterosexuals. Two studies demonstrate that a dispositional proneness to disgust ("disgust sensitivity") is associated with intuitive disapproval of gay people. Study 1 was based on previous research showing that people are more likely to describe a behavior as intentional when they see it as morally wrong (see Knobe, 2006, for a review). As predicted, the more disgust sensitive participants were, the more likely they were to describe an agent whose behavior had the side effect of causing gay men to kiss in public as having intentionally encouraged gay men to kiss publicly-even though most participants did not explicitly think it wrong to encourage gay men to kiss in public. No such effect occurred when subjects were asked about heterosexual kissing. Study 2 used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2006) as a dependent measure. The more disgust sensitive participants were, the more they showed unfavorable automatic associations with gay people as opposed to heterosexuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485621     DOI: 10.1037/a0015960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  31 in total

1.  Neural basis of disgust perception in racial prejudice.

Authors:  Yunzhe Liu; Wanjun Lin; Pengfei Xu; Dandan Zhang; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.

Authors:  Alek Chakroff; James Dungan; Jorie Koster-Hale; Amelia Brown; Rebecca Saxe; Liane Young
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex reduces interpersonal disgust.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Rebecca G Sperotto; Flavia Mattioli; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Moral Violations Reduce Oral Consumption.

Authors:  Cindy Chan; Leaf Van Boven; Eduardo B Andrade; Dan Ariely
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

5.  Effect of Partners' Disgust Responses on Psychological Wellbeing in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Haffiezhah A Azlan; Paul G Overton; Jane Simpson; Philip A Powell
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2017-12

6.  The role of emotion regulation in moral judgment.

Authors:  Chelsea Helion; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.480

7.  Cognitive mechanisms of disgust in the development and maintenance of psychopathology: A qualitative review and synthesis.

Authors:  Kelly A Knowles; Rebecca C Cox; Thomas Armstrong; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-06-07

8.  Testing the Disgust-Based Mechanism of Homonegative Attitudes in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Aleksandra Szymkow; Natalia Frankowska; Katarzyna Galasinska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Chenjing Wu; Xianyou He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Double Bind of Communicating About Zoonotic Origins: Describing Exotic Animal Sources of COVID-19 Increases Both Healthy and Discriminatory Avoidance Intentions.

Authors:  Mark LaCour; Brent Hughes; Micah Goldwater; Molly Ireland; Darrell Worthy; Jason Van Allen; Nick Gaylord; Garrett Van-Hoosier; Tyler Davis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.