BACKGROUND: Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors hypothesized that targeting uPAR, a receptor involved in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, adhesion, and angiogenesis, would impair the growth of CRC in the liver, the most common site of metastasis. METHODS: Human CRC cell lines were examined for uPAR expression by Western blot analysis. The in vitro effects of the uPAR monoclonal antibody (MoAb) (ATN-658) were tested in proliferation and migration assays. For in vivo studies, human HCT116 CRC cells were injected directly into the livers of mice in 2 separate studies, the first to determine the effect of therapy with ATN-658 on small-volume disease (therapy begun on Day 4), and a second study to determine the effect of therapy on established disease (therapy begun on Day 12). Mice were randomized to receive either nonspecific immunoglobulin G MoAb (control) or ATN-658, and were sacrificed 1 month after tumor implantation. RESULTS: uPAR was expressed by all CRC cell lines studied. In vitro, ATN-658 had minimal effect on CRC proliferation in monolayers, but significantly decreased CRC cell migration. In vivo, ATN-658 lead to significant reductions in tumor growth versus control when initiated either 4 or 12 days after tumor implantation (-65% vs control [P < or = .05] and -85% vs control [P < or = .05]). ATN-658 significantly inhibited in vivo tumor cell proliferation in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: uPAR MoAb therapy impaired CRC tumor growth in the liver in both small-volume and large-volume disease models.
BACKGROUND:Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors hypothesized that targeting uPAR, a receptor involved in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, adhesion, and angiogenesis, would impair the growth of CRC in the liver, the most common site of metastasis. METHODS:Human CRC cell lines were examined for uPAR expression by Western blot analysis. The in vitro effects of the uPAR monoclonal antibody (MoAb) (ATN-658) were tested in proliferation and migration assays. For in vivo studies, humanHCT116 CRC cells were injected directly into the livers of mice in 2 separate studies, the first to determine the effect of therapy with ATN-658 on small-volume disease (therapy begun on Day 4), and a second study to determine the effect of therapy on established disease (therapy begun on Day 12). Mice were randomized to receive either nonspecific immunoglobulin G MoAb (control) or ATN-658, and were sacrificed 1 month after tumor implantation. RESULTS:uPAR was expressed by all CRC cell lines studied. In vitro, ATN-658 had minimal effect on CRC proliferation in monolayers, but significantly decreased CRC cell migration. In vivo, ATN-658 lead to significant reductions in tumor growth versus control when initiated either 4 or 12 days after tumor implantation (-65% vs control [P < or = .05] and -85% vs control [P < or = .05]). ATN-658 significantly inhibited in vivo tumor cell proliferation in both studies. CONCLUSIONS:uPARMoAb therapy impaired CRC tumor growth in the liver in both small-volume and large-volume disease models.
Authors: S Ganesh; C F Sier; G Griffioen; H J Vloedgraven; A de Boer; K Welvaart; C J van de Velde; J H van Krieken; J H Verheijen; C B Lamers Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1994-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nikolaos A Dallas; Shaija Samuel; Ling Xia; Fan Fan; Michael J Gray; Sherry J Lim; Lee M Ellis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Inti Zlobec; Parham Minoo; Daniel Baumhoer; Kristi Baker; Luigi Terracciano; Jeremy R Jass; Alessandro Lugli Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Todd W Bauer; Fan Fan; Wenbiao Liu; Ernest R Camp; Anthony Yang; Ray J Somcio; Corazon D Bucana; Rajeeva Singh; Lee M Ellis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Oliver Stoeltzing; Syed A Ahmad; Wenbiao Liu; Marya F McCarty; Jane S Wey; Alexander A Parikh; Fan Fan; Niels Reinmuth; Michiya Kawaguchi; Corazon D Bucana; Lee M Ellis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Ganesh; C F Sier; M M Heerding; J H van Krieken; G Griffioen; K Welvaart; C J van de Velde; J H Verheijen; C B Lamers; H W Verspaget Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1997 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Shafaat A Rabbani; Bushra Ateeq; Ani Arakelian; Maria Luisa Valentino; David E Shaw; Lisa M Dauffenbach; Christopher A Kerfoot; Andrew P Mazar Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Puja Gaur; Eric L Sceusi; Shaija Samuel; Ling Xia; Fan Fan; Yunfei Zhou; Jia Lu; Federico Tozzi; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Pablo Vivas-Mejia; Asif Rashid; Jason B Fleming; Eddie K Abdalla; Steven A Curley; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Anil K Sood; James C Yao; Lee M Ellis Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Hilary A Kenny; Payton Leonhardt; Andras Ladanyi; S Diane Yamada; Anthony Montag; Hae Kyung Im; Sujatha Jagadeeswaran; David E Shaw; Andrew P Mazar; Ernst Lengyel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Niaz Mahmood; Ani Arakelian; Haseeb Ahmed Khan; Imrana Tanvir; Andrew P Mazar; Shafaat A Rabbani Journal: Bone Res Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 13.567
Authors: Sreelatha Gopinath; Rama Rao Malla; Christopher S Gondi; Kiranmai Alapati; Daniel Fassett; Jeffrey D Klopfenstein; Dzung H Dinh; Meena Gujrati; Jasti S Rao Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240