R Steele1. 1. Rosie Steele, Department of General Practice, Dunluce Health Centre, 1 Dunluce Avenue, Belfast BT9 7HR, UK. rosieasteele@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abortion policy varies significantly between Northern Ireland and Norway. This is the first study to compare medical students' attitudes towards abortion in two different countries. OBJECTIVE: To assess medical students' attitudes to abortion at the University of Oslo (UiO) and Queen's University Belfast (QUB). DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire completed by 59 medical students at UiO and 86 medical students at QUB. PARTICIPANTS: Students who had completed their obstetrics and gynaecology placements during 2006/2007. RESULTS: The students' responses (UiO versus QUB) were as follows: response rate, 95.2% vs 92.5%; stated no religious affiliation, 48.0% vs 4.7%; pro-abortion, 78.2% vs 14.3% (chi(2) = 58.160, p<0.001); had seen an abortion while studying medicine, 74.6% vs 9.4% (chi(2) = 73.183, p<0.001); in favour of abortion when there was a threat to the mother's life, 100% vs 93.3% (chi(2) = 6.143, p = 0.150); in favour of providing abortion on the mother's request, 86.4% vs 9.3% (chi(2) = 42.067, p<0.001); in agreement that women should have access to free abortion services (mean value on a 5-point Likert scale 1.69 out of 5), versus in disagreement (mean 3.76, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in students' attitudes to abortion, reflecting differences in religious, legal and educational experiences.
BACKGROUND: Abortion policy varies significantly between Northern Ireland and Norway. This is the first study to compare medical students' attitudes towards abortion in two different countries. OBJECTIVE: To assess medical students' attitudes to abortion at the University of Oslo (UiO) and Queen's University Belfast (QUB). DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire completed by 59 medical students at UiO and 86 medical students at QUB. PARTICIPANTS: Students who had completed their obstetrics and gynaecology placements during 2006/2007. RESULTS: The students' responses (UiO versus QUB) were as follows: response rate, 95.2% vs 92.5%; stated no religious affiliation, 48.0% vs 4.7%; pro-abortion, 78.2% vs 14.3% (chi(2) = 58.160, p<0.001); had seen an abortion while studying medicine, 74.6% vs 9.4% (chi(2) = 73.183, p<0.001); in favour of abortion when there was a threat to the mother's life, 100% vs 93.3% (chi(2) = 6.143, p = 0.150); in favour of providing abortion on the mother's request, 86.4% vs 9.3% (chi(2) = 42.067, p<0.001); in agreement that women should have access to free abortion services (mean value on a 5-point Likert scale 1.69 out of 5), versus in disagreement (mean 3.76, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in students' attitudes to abortion, reflecting differences in religious, legal and educational experiences.
Authors: Pollyanna Cohen; Jonathan Mayhew; Faye Gishen; Henry W W Potts; Patricia A Lohr; Jayne Kavanagh Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Kornelia Zaręba; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Ewelina Kołb-Sielecka; Michał Ciebiera; Rosalia Ragusa; Jacek Gierus; Elena Commodari; Grzegorz Jakiel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 3.390