Literature DB >> 19482521

Particulate matter generated during monopolar and bipolar hysteroscopic human uterine tissue vaporization.

Martin Farrugia1, Sarah Y Hussain, David Perrett.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the insoluble particulate matter generated during hysteroscopic monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery.
DESIGN: In vitro comparative study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-1).
SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Eight patients undergoing hysterectomy with benign indications. INTERVENTION: Tissue blocks were divided, and 1g of tissue was vaporized using a monopolar and a bipolar vaporizing electrode.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The particles were examined at light microscopy to study their morphologic features. Particle analysis was carried out using a laser diffraction particle analyser. Monopolar uterine tissue vaporization generated particles of a smaller median diameter than did bipolar vaporization (0.13 microm and 0.25 microm, respectively). The distribution by particle surface area in both instruments seems to be complex, with peaks at 0.35 and 4.0 microm for monopolar-generated particles and 0.5 and 5.0 microm for bipolar-generated particles. Another smaller peak with larger particles produced by both instruments was identified at 30 microm. During monopolar uterine tissue vaporization, 9.96% of particles generated were smaller than 5 microm, whereas during bipolar vaporization, 3.81% of particles were smaller than 5 microm (p = .01).
CONCLUSION: Particulate matter generated during hysteroscopic electrosurgical vaporization using monopolar and bipolar instruments is heterodisperse and complex in shape. Monopolar vaporization results in particles of a smaller median diameter compared with bipolar vaporization. Both instruments generate 2 distinct populations of particles by surface area. The distribution of particles by volume during hysteroscopic electrosurgery is complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482521     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  2 in total

1.  Surgical smoke in hysteroscopic surgery: Does it really matter in COVID-19 times?

Authors:  M Farrugia
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.