Literature DB >> 19482405

Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades.

Katariina Laine1, Mika Gissler, Jouko Pirhonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Anal sphincter rupture is a serious complication of a vaginal delivery. A considerable number of women suffer permanent anal incontinence after this type of injury. The incidence of sphincter tears is believed to have increased over several decades in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland, but there seem to be significant differences in the incidence rates among these countries. The aim of this study is to compare frequency of anal sphincter tears among the four Nordic countries, and to discuss the possible reasons for the development. STUDY
DESIGN: Ecological register study. Anal sphincter ruptures are registered as third and fourth degree perineal tears in the national birth and hospital registries in the Nordic countries. Data from these registries were sampled from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The incidences of anal sphincter ruptures were calculated as percentages of all vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections were excluded. The test of relative proportions, Chi-square and linear regression modelling were used to study the difference between countries and time trends.
RESULTS: The frequency of anal sphincter rupture was significantly higher in three countries, Denmark 3.6%, Norway 4.1% and Sweden 4.2%, compared to Finland 0.6%. The trend was clearly increasing from the early 1970s in all countries.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in the Nordic countries in the incidence of anal sphincter tears and a significant increment in the incidence over three decades. Our hypothesis is that change in the routines during labour may be one reason for this increment. Higher episiotomy frequency in Finland may be one contributing reason. We assume that there has been a change in the conduct of labour during the last decades, and protecting the perineum may have lost its importance in the three Nordic countries, while the classic method of protecting perineum is still in use in Finland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482405     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of Accuracy of Episiotomy Incision in a Governmental Maternity Unit in Palestine: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Hadil Y Ali-Masri; Sahar J Hassan; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed W Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Erik Fosse; Hasan Alsalman; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Hands on or hands off the perineum: a survey of care of the perineum in labour (HOOPS).

Authors:  Ruben Trochez; Malcolm Waterfield; Robert M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Outcomes and follow-up after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  K Ramalingam; A K Monga
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Faecal incontinence 20 years after one birth: a comparison between vaginal delivery and caesarean section.

Authors:  Maria Gyhagen; Maria Bullarbo; Thorkild F Nielsen; Ian Milsom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Shiliang Liu; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Olof Stephansson; Neda Razaz; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Raanan Meyer; Amihai Rottenstreich; Michal Zamir; Hadas Ilan; Edward Ram; Menachem Alcalay; Gabriel Levin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.

Authors:  Sirisha Rao Gundabattula; Kameswari Surampudi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The role of nocturnal delivery and delivery during the holiday period in Finland on obstetric anal sphincter rupture rates- a population based observational study.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-02-05

9.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons.

Authors:  Shay Porat; David Baud; Dan Farine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  A prior cesarean section and incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Rufus Cartwright; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.