OBJECT: Tinnitus is one of the most common symptoms in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VSs), but the effect of surgery on this symptom has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to define the effect on tinnitus of tumor removal, cochlear nerve resection, and useful hearing preservation in patients with VSs. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the status of tinnitus before and after surgery in 242 patients with unilateral VSs who underwent surgery via the retrosigmoid lateral suboccipital approach. RESULTS: Of 242 patients, 171 (70.7%) complained of tinnitus before surgery; the symptom disappeared in 25.2%, improved in 33.3%, remained unchanged in 31.6%, and worsened in 9.9% of these cases after tumor removal. In the 171 patients with preoperative tinnitus, the cochlear nerve was resected in 85 (49.7%) and preserved in 86 (50.3%), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative tinnitus between these 2 groups (p = 0.293). In the 71 patients without preoperative tinnitus, the symptom developed postoperatively in 6 cases (8.5%). Among those without preoperative tinnitus, the cochlear nerve was resected in 45 cases (63.4%) and tinnitus appeared postoperatively in 3 (6.7%). The authors also analyzed the association between postoperative tinnitus and useful hearing preservation, but could not find any statistically significant association between the 2 factors (p = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor removal via the retrosigmoid lateral suboccipital approach may provide some chance for improvement of tinnitus in patients with VSs; however, neither cochlear nerve resection nor useful hearing preservation affects the postoperative development of tinnitus.
OBJECT: Tinnitus is one of the most common symptoms in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VSs), but the effect of surgery on this symptom has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to define the effect on tinnitus of tumor removal, cochlear nerve resection, and useful hearing preservation in patients with VSs. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the status of tinnitus before and after surgery in 242 patients with unilateral VSs who underwent surgery via the retrosigmoid lateral suboccipital approach. RESULTS: Of 242 patients, 171 (70.7%) complained of tinnitus before surgery; the symptom disappeared in 25.2%, improved in 33.3%, remained unchanged in 31.6%, and worsened in 9.9% of these cases after tumor removal. In the 171 patients with preoperative tinnitus, the cochlear nerve was resected in 85 (49.7%) and preserved in 86 (50.3%), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative tinnitus between these 2 groups (p = 0.293). In the 71 patients without preoperative tinnitus, the symptom developed postoperatively in 6 cases (8.5%). Among those without preoperative tinnitus, the cochlear nerve was resected in 45 cases (63.4%) and tinnitus appeared postoperatively in 3 (6.7%). The authors also analyzed the association between postoperative tinnitus and useful hearing preservation, but could not find any statistically significant association between the 2 factors (p = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS:Tumor removal via the retrosigmoid lateral suboccipital approach may provide some chance for improvement of tinnitus in patients with VSs; however, neither cochlear nerve resection nor useful hearing preservation affects the postoperative development of tinnitus.
Authors: Matthew L Bush; Sarah S Burns; Janet Oblinger; Sholpan Davletova; Long-Sheng Chang; D Bradley Welling; Abraham Jacob Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Matthew L Bush; Janet Oblinger; Victoria Brendel; Griffin Santarelli; Jie Huang; Elena M Akhmametyeva; Sarah S Burns; Justin Wheeler; Jeremy Davis; Charles W Yates; Abhik R Chaudhury; Samuel Kulp; Ching-Shih Chen; Long-Sheng Chang; D Bradley Welling; Abraham Jacob Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Martin Chovanec; Eduard Zvěřina; Oliver Profant; Zuzana Balogová; Jan Kluh; Josef Syka; Jiří Lisý; Ilja Merunka; Jiří Skřivan; Jan Betka Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Matthew Barker; Hans Jürgen Solinski; Haruka Hashimoto; Thomas Tagoe; Nadia Pilati; Martine Hamann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240