Literature DB >> 19480012

Gape and bite force in the rodents Onychomys leucogaster and Peromyscus maniculatus: does jaw-muscle anatomy predict performance?

Susan H Williams1, Erika Peiffer, Sonya Ford.   

Abstract

Compared with the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, the grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leucogaster, exhibits modifications in its jaw-muscle architecture that promote wide gapes and large bite forces at wide gapes to prey upon large vertebrate prey. In this study, we determine whether jaw-muscle anatomy predicts gape and biting performance in O. leucogaster, and we also assess the influence of gape on bite force in the two species. Although O. leucogaster has an absolutely longer jaw, which facilitates larger gapes, maximum passive gape is similar in both species, averaging approximately 12.5 mm. Thus, when scaled to jaw length, O. leucogaster has a smaller maximum passive gape. These results suggest that predatory behaviors of O. leucogaster may not require remarkably large gapes. On the other hand, both absolute and relative bite forces exerted by O. leucogaster are significantly larger than those of P. maniculatus. The largest bite forces in both species occur at 5.0 mm of gape at the incisors, or 40% of maximum gape. Although bite force in both species decreases at larger gapes, O. leucogaster does maintain a larger percentage of maximum bite force at gapes larger than 40% of maximum passive gape. Therefore, although structural modifications in the masticatory apparatus of O. leucogaster may constrain gape, they may help to maintain bite force at large gapes. These results suggest that increases in gape differentially influence the length-tension properties of the jaw muscles in the two species. Finally, these results highlight the importance of considering the effect of muscle stretch on force production in comparative studies of bite force. As a first approximation, it appears that gapes of 40-50% of maximum gape in rodents optimizes bite force production at the incisors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19480012     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  20 in total

1.  The morphology of the mouse masticatory musculature.

Authors:  Hester Baverstock; Nathan S Jeffery; Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Go big or go fish: morphological specializations in carnivorous bats.

Authors:  Sharlene E Santana; Elena Cheung
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Morphological divergence in giant fossil dormice.

Authors:  Jesse J Hennekam; Roger B J Benson; Victoria L Herridge; Nathan Jeffery; Enric Torres-Roig; Josep Antoni Alcover; Philip G Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Grasshopper mice employ distinct vocal production mechanisms in different social contexts.

Authors:  Bret Pasch; Isao T Tokuda; Tobias Riede
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Structure-Function Relationships of the Temporomandibular Joint in Response to Altered Loading.

Authors:  Jennifer L Robinson; Paola Soria; Helen H Lu; Jing Chen; Sunil Wadhwa
Journal:  J Oral Facial Pain Headache       Date:  2019-07-24

6.  A complex genetic architecture underlies mandibular evolution in big mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Jacob P Nelson; Melissa M Gray; Sara Weigel; Christopher J Vinyard; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Temporomandibular joint pain: a critical role for Trpv4 in the trigeminal ganglion.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Susan H Williams; Amy L McNulty; Ji Hee Hong; Suk Hee Lee; Nicole E Rothfusz; Puja K Parekh; Carlene Moore; Robert W Gereau; Andrea B Taylor; Fan Wang; Farshid Guilak; Wolfgang Liedtke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Masticatory Apparatus Performance and Functional Morphology in the Extremely Large Mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Jacob P Nelson; Sara E Weigel; Melissa M Gray; Bret A Payseur; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Emily J Rayfield; Michael J Fagan; Anthony Herrel; Todd C Pataky; Nathan Jeffery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In Vivo Measurement of Mesokinesis in Gekko gecko: The Role of Cranial Kinesis during Gape Display, Feeding and Biting.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Susan H Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.