Literature DB >> 19479667

GSK's novel split-virus adjuvanted vaccines for the prevention of the H5N1 strain of avian influenza infection.

Taff Jones1.   

Abstract

Although influenza pandemics occur infrequently, they are unpredictable. Given that humans had not been previously exposed to the novel H5N1 strain, few (if any) individuals have any degree of immunity to the strain. GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) has developed two inactivated split H5N1 vaccines adjuvanted with GSK's proprietary oil-in-water emulsion AS03: GSK-1562902A (produced in Dresden, Germany) and GSK-1557484A (produced in Québec, Canada). The vaccines principally use an A/Vietnam strain virus; following the vaccination of influenza-naïve ferrets, potent neutralizing titers against the homologous A/Vietnam strain virus and against a heterologous A/Indonesia strain virus were elicited. In phase I, II and III clinical trials, two administrations of low doses (3.8 microg) of the vaccines induced protective immunity in more than 90% of vaccinees. The vaccines were generally well tolerated; the most frequently reported local adverse event was pain at the injection site. The vaccines, which can be administered in the pre-pandemic and pandemic setting, were approved in Europe in May 2008 as Prepandrix and Pandemrix, respectively. Phase II/III trials were also ongoing at the time of publication for both GSK-1562902A and GSK-1557484A. With the enormous demand for an effective vaccine in the event of an H5N1 pandemic, GSK's inactivated split H5N1 virus vaccine likely will be a highly valued product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19479667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther        ISSN: 1464-8431


  7 in total

1.  Swine flu agitates the adjuvant debate.

Authors:  Charlotte Schubert
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Use of a polyanionic carbomer, Carbopol971P, in combination with MF59, improves antibody responses to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein.

Authors:  Antu K Dey; Brian Burke; Yide Sun; Karin Hartog; Jonathan L Heeney; David Montefiori; Indresh K Srivastava; Susan W Barnett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in adult hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Randy M Stalter; Kristina M Bacon; Julie H Y Tai; Rachel R Bailey; Shanta M Zimmer; Michael M Wagner
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  CAF01 potentiates immune responses and efficacy of an inactivated influenza vaccine in ferrets.

Authors:  Cyril Jean-Marie Martel; Else Marie Agger; Julie Juul Poulsen; Trine Hammer Jensen; Lars Andresen; Dennis Christensen; Lars Peter Nielsen; Merete Blixenkrone-Møller; Peter Andersen; Bent Aasted
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An overview on the field of micro- and nanotechnologies for synthetic Peptide-based vaccines.

Authors:  Aiala Salvador; Manoli Igartua; Rosa Maria Hernández; José Luis Pedraz
Journal:  J Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 6.  Inferring reasons for the failure of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines in clinical trials.

Authors:  Fabio Bagnoli; Sylvie Bertholet; Guido Grandi
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Active Immunization with Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Staphylococcus aureus Effectively Protects against Staphylococcal Lung Infections, Mainly via Th1 Cell-Mediated Immunity.

Authors:  Seng Jin Choi; Min-Hye Kim; Jinseong Jeon; Oh Youn Kim; Youngwoo Choi; Jihye Seo; Sung-Wook Hong; Won-Hee Lee; Seong Gyu Jeon; Yong Song Gho; Young-Koo Jee; Yoon-Keun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.