BACKGROUND: An emerging body of evidence suggests that ambient levels of air pollution during pregnancy are associated with preterm birth. METHODS: To further investigate these relationships we used vital record data to construct a retrospective cohort of 476,489 births occurring between 1994 and 2004 in 5 central counties of metropolitan Atlanta. Using a time-series approach, we examined aggregated daily counts of preterm birth in relation to ambient levels of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone, particulate matter <10 microm in diameter (PM10), particulate matter <2.5 microm in diameter (PM2.5), and speciated PM measurements. Daily pollutant levels in 5-county Atlanta were characterized using a population-weighted spatial average of air quality monitors in the study area. We also examined ambient concentrations at individual monitors in analyses limited to mothers with residential geocodes within 4 miles of each monitor. Relationships between average pollution levels during 3 gestational windows of interest were modeled using Poisson generalized linear models. Results were adjusted for seasonal and long-term time trends. RESULTS: Although most results were null, there were 3 positive associations between ambient pollution levels and preterm birth in the 4-mile capture-area analyses. Daily preterm birth rates were associated with average NO2 concentrations in the preceding 6 weeks and with average PM2.5 sulfate and PM2.5 water-soluble metal concentrations in the preceding week. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide limited support for late-pregnancy effects of ambient air pollution on preterm birth.
BACKGROUND: An emerging body of evidence suggests that ambient levels of air pollution during pregnancy are associated with preterm birth. METHODS: To further investigate these relationships we used vital record data to construct a retrospective cohort of 476,489 births occurring between 1994 and 2004 in 5 central counties of metropolitan Atlanta. Using a time-series approach, we examined aggregated daily counts of preterm birth in relation to ambient levels of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone, particulate matter <10 microm in diameter (PM10), particulate matter <2.5 microm in diameter (PM2.5), and speciated PM measurements. Daily pollutant levels in 5-county Atlanta were characterized using a population-weighted spatial average of air quality monitors in the study area. We also examined ambient concentrations at individual monitors in analyses limited to mothers with residential geocodes within 4 miles of each monitor. Relationships between average pollution levels during 3 gestational windows of interest were modeled using Poisson generalized linear models. Results were adjusted for seasonal and long-term time trends. RESULTS: Although most results were null, there were 3 positive associations between ambient pollution levels and preterm birth in the 4-mile capture-area analyses. Daily preterm birth rates were associated with average NO2 concentrations in the preceding 6 weeks and with average PM2.5 sulfate and PM2.5water-soluble metal concentrations in the preceding week. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide limited support for late-pregnancy effects of ambient air pollution on preterm birth.
Authors: Katherine S Wade; James A Mulholland; Amit Marmur; Armistead G Russell; Ben Hartsell; Eric Edgerton; Mitch Klein; Lance Waller; Jennifer L Peel; Paige E Tolbert Journal: J Air Waste Manag Assoc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.235
Authors: Sharon K Sagiv; Pauline Mendola; Dana Loomis; Amy H Herring; Lucas M Neas; David A Savitz; Charles Poole Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jong-Han Leem; Brian M Kaplan; Youn K Shim; Hana R Pohl; Carol A Gotway; Stevan M Bullard; J Felix Rogers; Melissa M Smith; Carolyn A Tylenda Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Cande V Ananth; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Yongmei Huang; Zev Ross; Alexander M Friedman; Michelle A Williams; Shuang Wang; Murray A Mittleman; Joel Schwartz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Deshayne B Fell; David L Buckeridge; Robert W Platt; Jay S Kaufman; Olga Basso; Kumanan Wilson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.897