Literature DB >> 19477889

Two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty using an antibiotic-loaded spacer: retrospective comparison between short-term and prolonged antibiotic therapy.

Pang-Hsin Hsieh1, Kuo-Chin Huang, Po-Cheng Lee, Mel S Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The optimal duration of systemic antibiotic therapy in patients with prosthetic hip infection (PHI) undergoing staged exchange arthroplasty (SEA) has not been determined. We hypothesized that with an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer (ALCS), in the interim, short-term antibiotic therapy is as effective as a conventional prolonged treatment course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 99 patients with PHI who were managed with SEA using an ALCS from February 2002 to October 2005. A standard (4-6 week) antibiotic treatment course was administered in the first 46 patients and a short-term (1 week) therapy was adopted in the subsequent 53 patients.
RESULTS: Eight patients (four in each group) had persistent infection following the first attempt of surgery and antibiotic treatment; in three of them the infection was cured by additional debridement prior to re-implantation. Forty-two (91%) patients in the long-term group and 47 (89%) patients in the short-term group were free of infection (P = 0.67) at an average follow-up of 43 months (range, 24-60 months). Five (11%) patients developed complications related to prolonged antibiotic therapy. The short-term treatment resulted in a shorter hospital stay (18 versus 43 days, P < 0.001) and a lower direct medical cost (US$13 732 versus US$21 756, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term antibiotic therapy was not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure. Given the higher costs and incidence of complications, protracted courses of antibiotic administration may not necessarily be routine practice in patients with PHI undergoing SEA, provided that an ALCS is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477889     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  26 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Hip joint infections - Results of a questionnaire among 28 university orthopedic departments].

Authors:  K Anagnostakos; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Ellie J C Goldstein; Tom Coenye; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Characteristics and treatment outcomes of 69 cases with early prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee.

Authors:  Y Achermann; P Stasch; S Preiss; K Lucke; M Vogt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of Daptomycin versus standard-of-care therapy for management of patients with osteomyelitis associated with prosthetic devices undergoing two-stage revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ivor Byren; Shruta Rege; Ed Campanaro; Sara Yankelev; Diane Anastasiou; Gennady Kuropatkin; Richard Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology.

Authors:  P Bejon; A Berendt; B L Atkins; N Green; H Parry; S Masters; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; I Byren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.