Literature DB >> 19477691

The prevalence cervical facet arthrosis: an osseous study in a cadveric population.

Michael J Lee1, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical facet arthrosis has been implicated as a cause for neck pain, radiculopathy, occipital headache, and ear pain.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the occurrence of facet arthrosis in the cervical spine. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This study examined cadaveric specimens from the Hamann Todd Collection. PATIENT SAMPLE: None. OUTCOMES MEASURES: None.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-five skeletally mature human cervical spines from the Hamann Todd Collection in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History were obtained for analysis. We analyzed the facets for arthrosis. We graded no arthrosis as Grade 0. Facets with peripheral osteophytic reaction, but with no lateral mass distortion were graded as Grade 1. Facets with peripheral osteophytic reaction and lateral mass distortion were graded as Grade 2. Facets that were ankylosed were graded as Grade 3. Each specimen was examined bilaterally at levels from C2-C3 through C6-C7, yielding 4,650 specimen assessments. The data were analyzed to compare cervical levels, gender, facet side, age groups, and race. Proportion analysis, using the Fisher exact test, was used to assess for statistical difference between various groupings.
RESULTS: In the entire population of 465 specimens, the upper cervical specimens appeared to be affected by facet arthrosis more frequently than the lower levels; 12.37% of the specimens had bony evidence of arthrosis at the C2-C3 level; 13.33% of the specimens had arthrosis occur at the C3-C4 level; 14.62% at the C4-C5 level; 7.85% at the C5-C6 level, and 4.84% at the C6-C7 level. The large majority of all cervical facet arthrosis was found to be Grade 1 at all levels. In the older population, the prevalence of facet arthrosis is as high as 29.87% for the C4-C5 level. C4-C5 level appears to be affected the most frequently, followed by the C3-C4 level, then C2-C3, C5-C6, and C6-C7.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cervical facet arthrosis increases with age, and occurs more commonly in the upper cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477691     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  Role of facet joints in spine pain and image-guided treatment: a review.

Authors:  J L Bykowski; W H W Wong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  FOAR: Facet Joint Osteoarthritis with Radiculopathy: a case series and a hypothesis explaining spinal nerve irritation in the absence of osteodiskal compression.

Authors:  T Kucinski; J Schubert
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints.

Authors:  Alfred C Gellhorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Pradeep Suri
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  Morphological Asymmetry of the Superior Cervical Facets from C3 through C7 due to Degeneration.

Authors:  Nicolas Van Vlasselaer; Peter Van Roy; Erik Cattrysse
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Characterization of bony changes localized to the cervical articular processes in a mixed population of horses.

Authors:  Kevin K Haussler; Roy R Pool; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Philip K Louie; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-02-28

9.  Cervical medial branch block progression to radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective clinical audit.

Authors:  David Sherwood; Evan Berlin; Adam Epps; James Gardner; Byron J Schneider
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-11-03

10.  A New MRI Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Based on Axial T2-Weighted Images.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Joon Woo Lee; Jee Won Chai; Hye Jin Yoo; Yusuhn Kang; Jiwoon Seo; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.