Literature DB >> 19477532

Removal of inhaled foreign bodies--middle of the night or the next morning?

Navin Mani1, Marlene Soma, Sarah Massey, David Albert, C Martin Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Foreign body inhalation is a potentially life-threatening emergency and is the commonest cause of accidental death in children under one year old. There is varying opinion regarding the urgency for removal of inhaled foreign bodies; most centres in the United Kingdom will take the patient to theatre as soon as can be arranged, regardless of the time of day. At Great Ormond Street Hospital for children it has been standard practice to perform rigid bronchoscopy and removal of an inhaled foreign body on the next available daytime operating list, providing the patient is clinically stable, even if this incurs a delay until the following day. We aimed to identify if any additional morbidity resulted from delaying removal of the foreign body.
METHODS: Retrospective case note review of all cases of foreign body inhalation seen at our institution over an 11-year period between July 1996 and July 2007.
RESULTS: 165 patients were referred to our institution with a suspected inhaled foreign body in the study period. 14 patients were managed conservatively due to low clinical suspicion and 57 patients underwent a negative bronchoscopy: these groups were excluded from our analysis. Of the remaining 94 patients, only 7 were taken to theatre outside a scheduled daytime operating list. All of these patients had signs of severe respiratory distress and were operated upon within 4h of their arrival. Of the remaining patients, 41 were taken to theatre on the day of presentation and 46 on the day after presentation; all within normal daytime working hours. No additional post-operative morbidity was identified as a result of our policy to delay bronchoscopy until the next available daytime operating list.
CONCLUSIONS: It is our perception that delaying removal of suspected inhaled foreign bodies to allow optimal circumstances for manipulation of the paediatric airway is a safe practice at our institution. We have not identified any adverse outcomes related to delaying bronchoscopy to the next available daytime operating list in the clinically stable patient. This remains our preferred method of practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477532     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  5 in total

1.  A light bulb moment: an unusual cause of foreign body aspiration in children.

Authors:  C T Lau; Lawrence Lan; Kenneth Wong; Paul Kwong Hang Tam
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 2.  The anaesthetic consideration of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children.

Authors:  Pinar Kendigelen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  [Extracting a tracheobronchial bronchial foreign body with a uretheroscope].

Authors:  Hicham Kechna; Omar Ouzzad; Youness Aissaoui; Karim Nadour; Rachid Zaini
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-01-28

4.  Bronchoscopy for foreign body aspiration and effects of nebulized albuterol and budesonide combination.

Authors:  Bulent Akcora; Mehmet Emin Celikkaya; Cahit Ozer
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Rigid Bronchoscopy in Foreign Body Aspiration Diagnosis and Treatment in Children.

Authors:  Aleksandra Pietraś; Marcin Markiewicz; Grażyna Mielnik-Niedzielska
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.