Literature DB >> 19476899

Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model.

Christian Hollinsky1, Thomas Kolbe, Ingrid Walter, Anja Joachim, Simone Sandberg, Thomas Koch, Thomas Rülicke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microhooks are small structures on the surface of the Progrip (PG; Sofradim Corp) mesh to ensure its anchorage in tissue. Additional fixation is not required. The aim of this animal study was to compare the strength of incorporation, foreign body reaction, and changes in material after implantation of this novel mesh with the current fixation alternatives, namely the hernia stapler (HS) and fibrin glue (FG). STUDY
DESIGN: Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this two-phase, prospective randomized study. Polypropylene meshes (Parietene light; Sofradim Corp) were positioned bilaterally on the abdominal muscle. The randomized mesh fixation groups were named HS, FG, PG, and UM (unfixed mesh). Half of the rats in each group were sacrificed and analyzed 5 days after implantation, and the second half were sacrificed and analyzed after 2 months. Measured parameters were strength of incorporation, foreign-body reaction to, and potential degradation of, mesh and fixation systems.
RESULTS: After 5 days, strength of incorporation was substantially higher for PG (3.2 N/cm(2)) and HS (2.7 N/cm(2)) compared with FG (0.9 N/cm(2)) or UM (1.5 N/cm(2)). After 2 months, PG had a much greater strength of incorporation (14.8 N/cm(2)) compared with all other groups (HS 11.7 N/cm(2); FG 11.4 N/cm(2); UM 8.7 N/cm(2)). Inflammatory reactions were considerably more severe after 5 days than after 2 months. No significant differences in foreign-body reactions were found between groups. At neither time point were signs of degradation detected by scanning electron microscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: PG demonstrated a substantially stronger strength of incorporation in muscle tissue compared with other fixation systems and is an economic alternative to HS or FG. Laparoscopic mesh placement of PG requires some practice because of the microhooks. Clinical studies will have to be performed before the value of this mesh can be established for laparoscopic application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19476899     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  18 in total

1.  Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months.

Authors:  A Kingsnorth; M Gingell-Littlejohn; S Nienhuijs; S Schüle; P Appel; P Ziprin; A Eklund; M Miserez; S Smeds
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Application of the novel enhanced transabdominal preperitoneal (ETAP) technique for laparoscopic suprapubic incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Zhonglin Zhu; Chao Zhang; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Short-term strength of non-penetrating mesh fixation: LifeMesh™, Tisseel™, and ProGrip™.

Authors:  Charles P Shahan; Nathaniel N Stoikes; Esra Roan; James Tatum; David L Webb; Guy R Voeller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Francesco Puccetti; Ugo Elmore; Simonetta Massaron; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia.

Authors:  A Ziya Anadol; Murat Akin; Osman Kurukahvecioglu; Ekmel Tezel; Emin Ersoy
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  A comparison of Progrip(®) and Adhesix (®) self-adhering hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; N Riepl; J Brand; C Keibl; H Redl; R H Fortelny; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study.

Authors:  Erin Bresnahan; Andrew Bates; Andrew Wu; Mark Reiner; Brian Jacob
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.

Authors:  D Sanders; J Lambie; P Bond; R Moate; J A Steer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Polymer Hernia Repair Materials: Adapting to Patient Needs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez; Verónica Gómez-Gil; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Gemma Pascual; Juan Manuel Bellón
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue.

Authors:  Seung Yun Yang; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; Geoffroy C Sisk; Kyeng Min Park; Woo Kyung Cho; Martin Villiger; Brett E Bouma; Bohdan Pomahac; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.