Literature DB >> 19476733

Phase II designs for anticancer botanicals and supplements.

Andrew J Vickers1.   

Abstract

The purpose of a phase II trial is to determine whether an anticancer agent is sufficiently promising to take forward to a definitive, randomized, phase III study. Traditional phase II trials use tumor response as an end point, defined as a 50% or greater decrease in tumor size. Anticancer botanicals and supplements are unlikely to bring about rapid tumor regression, even if they do extend survival. Accordingly, response needs to be defined in terms of survival, such as being progression-free at 6 months. Such an approach requires historical data on the expected survival rate in the absence of the botanical or supplement. We present a simple phase II design for botanicals and supplements that is based on appropriate use of historical data, incorporating adjustment for both sampling variation and case mix. The basic principle is to use a historical cohort to generate a statistical prediction model, use this to predict results of patients in the phase II study, and then compare the predictions to the observed results. Such a design asks whether patients treated by the new agent are doing better than expected; if so, this suggests that the agent should be tested further in phase III trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19476733      PMCID: PMC2736093     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Integr Oncol        ISSN: 1715-894X


  4 in total

1.  Improving the decision to pursue a phase 3 clinical trial by adjusting for patient-specific factors in evaluating phase 2 treatment efficacy data.

Authors:  Glenn Heller; Michael W Kattan; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Setting the bar in phase II trials: the use of historical data for determining "go/no go" decision for definitive phase III testing.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Vennus Ballen; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  A standardization method to adjust for the effect of patient selection in phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  M Mazumdar; M Fazzari; K S Panageas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Adjuvant weekly docetaxel for patients with high risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional pilot study.

Authors:  Adam S Kibel; Eli Rosenbaum; Michael W Kattan; Joel Picus; Robert Dreicer; Eric A Klein; Gurkamal S Chatta; Joel B Nelson; Robert S DiPaola; Bruce J Roth; Michael S Cookson; George Wilding; David F Jarrard; Tomasz M Beer; Christopher W Ryan; Daniel P Petrylak; Mitchell C Benson; Alan W Partin; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.