PURPOSE: A considerable number of chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) patients remain under continuous lamivudine treatment, although switching treatment to entecavir could be beneficial. We investigated the antiviral efficacy of switching treatment to entecavir in CH-B patients without apparent evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment. METHODS: Forty-four CH-B patients, who underwent lamivudine treatment for more than 6 months and showed no evidence of lamivudine resistance, switched to entecavir. Serial changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were correlated with the patients' baseline HBV DNA at the commencement of entecavir administration. The entecavir-resistant substitution was examined by PCR-direct sequencing. The median follow-up period of entecavir treatment was 20 (10-23) months. RESULTS: All 31 patients with baseline HBV DNA <2.6 logcopies/ml maintained HBV DNA-negative status during entecavir treatment. Of seven patients having HBV DNA of 2.6-<4.0 logcopies/ml, all achieved undetectable HBV DNA at the end of follow-up. As for six patients having HBV DNA >or=4.0 logcopies/ml, three patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA, whereas virological breakthrough was observed in one patient at month 15. An entecavir-resistant virus having rtM204V, rtL180M and rtS202G substitutions was detected in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: The lamivudine-to-entecavir switching treatment may be generally recommendable in CH-B patients without evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment. However, great care should be taken with respect to the emergence of entecavir-resistance, especially in patients who do not respond well to the preceding lamivudine treatment.
PURPOSE: A considerable number of chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) patients remain under continuous lamivudine treatment, although switching treatment to entecavir could be beneficial. We investigated the antiviral efficacy of switching treatment to entecavir in CH-B patients without apparent evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment. METHODS: Forty-four CH-B patients, who underwent lamivudine treatment for more than 6 months and showed no evidence of lamivudine resistance, switched to entecavir. Serial changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were correlated with the patients' baseline HBV DNA at the commencement of entecavir administration. The entecavir-resistant substitution was examined by PCR-direct sequencing. The median follow-up period of entecavir treatment was 20 (10-23) months. RESULTS: All 31 patients with baseline HBV DNA <2.6 logcopies/ml maintained HBV DNA-negative status during entecavir treatment. Of seven patients having HBV DNA of 2.6-<4.0 logcopies/ml, all achieved undetectable HBV DNA at the end of follow-up. As for six patients having HBV DNA >or=4.0 logcopies/ml, three patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA, whereas virological breakthrough was observed in one patient at month 15. An entecavir-resistant virus having rtM204V, rtL180M and rtS202G substitutions was detected in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: The lamivudine-to-entecavir switching treatment may be generally recommendable in CH-B patients without evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment. However, great care should be taken with respect to the emergence of entecavir-resistance, especially in patients who do not respond well to the preceding lamivudine treatment.
Authors: Daniel J Tenney; Ronald E Rose; Carl J Baldick; Steven M Levine; Kevin A Pokornowski; Ann W Walsh; Jie Fang; Cheng-Fang Yu; Sharon Zhang; Charles E Mazzucco; Betsy Eggers; Mayla Hsu; Mary Jane Plym; Patricia Poundstone; Joanna Yang; Richard J Colonno Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: C E Westland; H Yang; W E Delaney; M Wulfsohn; N Lama; C S Gibbs; M D Miller; J Fry; C L Brosgart; E R Schiff; S Xiong Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: J L Dienstag; E R Schiff; T L Wright; R P Perrillo; H W Hann; Z Goodman; L Crowther; L D Condreay; M Woessner; M Rubin; N A Brown Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M I Allen; M Deslauriers; C W Andrews; G A Tipples; K A Walters; D L Tyrrell; N Brown; L D Condreay Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: C L Lai; R N Chien; N W Leung; T T Chang; R Guan; D I Tai; K Y Ng; P C Wu; J C Dent; J Barber; S L Stephenson; D F Gray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert Perrillo; Hie-Won Hann; David Mutimer; Bernard Willems; Nancy Leung; William M Lee; Alison Moorat; Stephen Gardner; Mary Woessner; Eric Bourne; Carol L Brosgart; Eugene Schiff Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Marion G Peters; H w Hann Hw; Paul Martin; E Jenny Heathcote; P Buggisch; R Rubin; M Bourliere; K Kowdley; C Trepo; D f Gray Df; M Sullivan; K Kleber; R Ebrahimi; S Xiong; Carol L Brosgart Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 22.682