Literature DB >> 19474174

Tone-specific and nonspecific plasticity of inferior colliculus elicited by pseudo-conditioning: role of acetylcholine and auditory and somatosensory cortices.

Weiqing Ji1, Nobuo Suga.   

Abstract

Experience-dependent plasticity in the central sensory systems depends on activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Sensitization or nonspecific augmentation of central auditory neurons elicited by pseudo-conditioning with unpaired conditioning tonal (CS) and unconditioned electric leg (US) stimuli is quite different from tone-specific plasticity, called best frequency (BF) shifts, of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning with paired CS and US. Therefore the neural circuits eliciting the nonspecific augmentation must be different from that eliciting the BF shifts. We first examined plastic changes in the response properties of collicular neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudo-conditioning and found that it elicited prominent nonspecific augmentation-an auditory response increase, a frequency-tuning broadening, and a threshold decreas-and that, in addition, it elicited a small short-lasting BF shift only when the CS frequency was 5 kHz lower than the BF of a recorded neuron. We examined the role of acetylcholine and the auditory and somatosensory cortices in these collicular changes. The development of the nonspecific augmentation was affected little by a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist applied to the inferior colliculus and by a GABA(A) receptor agonist applied to the auditory or somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting BF shift as they abolished the large long-lasting cortical and short-lasting collicular BF shifts elicited by the conditioning. These results indicate that, different from the BF shift, the nonspecific augmentation of the inferior colliculus depends on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the auditory and somatosensory cortices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474174      PMCID: PMC2724339          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00222.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Corticofugal modulation of the midbrain frequency map in the bat auditory system.

Authors:  W Yan; N Suga
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Corticofugal feedback for auditory midbrain plasticity elicited by tones and electrical stimulation of basal forebrain in mice.

Authors:  Yunfeng Zhang; Jacqueline J Hakes; Stephan P Bonfield; Jun Yan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Corticofugal feedback for collicular plasticity evoked by electric stimulation of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yongkui Zhang; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: a synthesis of two disciplines.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Modulation of the receptive fields of midbrain neurons elicited by thalamic electrical stimulation through corticofugal feedback.

Authors:  Yamin Wu; Jun Yan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Tone-specific and nonspecific plasticity of the auditory cortex elicited by pseudoconditioning: role of acetylcholine receptors and the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Weiqing Ji; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Electrical stimulation of the midbrain tectum enhances dopamine release in the frontal cortex.

Authors:  G Cuadra; A Zurita; C E Macedo; V A Molina; M L Brandão
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory cortex and the inferior colliculus of bats: role of the corticofugal system.

Authors:  E Gao; N Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Corticofugal shaping of frequency tuning curves in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of mice.

Authors:  Jun Yan; Yunfeng Zhang; Günter Ehret
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  16 in total

1.  Modulation of thalamic auditory neurons by the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Weiguo Yang; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory fear conditioning modifies steady-state evoked potentials in the rat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  André Luiz Vieira Lockmann; Flávio Afonso Gonçalves Mourão; Marcio Flávio Dutra Moraes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2011-12-01

4.  Musicians' enhanced neural differentiation of speech sounds arises early in life: developmental evidence from ages 3 to 30.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Samantha O'Connell; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Cholinergic cells of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum: connections with auditory structures from cochlear nucleus to cortex.

Authors:  Brett R Schofield; Susan D Motts; Jeffrey G Mellott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Tuning shifts of the auditory system by corticocortical and corticofugal projections and conditioning.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Embracing Complexity in Defensive Networks.

Authors:  Drew B Headley; Vasiliki Kanta; Pinelopi Kyriazi; Denis Paré
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  M1 muscarinic receptor for the development of auditory cortical function.

Authors:  Karalee K Shideler; Jun Yan
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.041

9.  Suppression and facilitation of auditory neurons through coordinated acoustic and midbrain stimulation: investigating a deep brain stimulator for tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah J Offutt; Kellie J Ryan; Alexander E Konop; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Histaminergic modulation of nonspecific plasticity of the auditory system and differential gating.

Authors:  Weiqing Ji; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.