Literature DB >> 19474046

Individual and social discounting in a viscous population.

Peter D Sozou1.   

Abstract

Social discounting in economics involves applying a diminishing weight to community-wide benefits or costs into the future. It impacts on public policy decisions involving future positive or negative effects, but there is no consensus on the correct basis for determining the social discount rate. This study presents an evolutionary biological framework for social discounting. How an organism should value future benefits to its local community is governed by the extent to which members of the community in the future are likely to be its kin. Trade-offs between immediate and delayed benefits to an individual or to its community are analysed for a modelled patch-structured iteroparous population with limited dispersal. It is shown that the social discount rate is generally lower than the individual (private) discount rate. The difference in the two rates is most pronounced, in ratio terms, when the dispersal level is low and the hazard rate for patch destruction is much smaller than the individual mortality rate. When decisions involve enforced collective action rather than individuals acting independently, social investment increases but the social discount rate remains the same.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474046      PMCID: PMC2817212          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  18 in total

1.  Discounting: an eye on the future.

Authors:  Lawrence H Goulder; Robert N Stavins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Augmented discounting: interaction between ageing and time-preference behaviour.

Authors:  Peter D Sozou; Robert M Seymour
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Economics and the evolution of life histories.

Authors:  Alan R Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A kin selection model for the evolution of virulence.

Authors:  S A Frank
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The evolution of trans-generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction.

Authors:  L Lehmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph.

Authors:  Peter D Taylor; Troy Day; Geoff Wild
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The evolution of helping and harming on graphs: the return of the inclusive fitness effect.

Authors:  L Lehmann; L Keller; D J T Sumpter
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  The evolution of parasite virulence, superinfection, and host resistance.

Authors:  Sylvain Gandon; Minus van Baalen; Vincent A A Jansen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Geography is a better determinant of human genetic differentiation than ethnicity.

Authors:  Andrea Manica; Franck Prugnolle; François Balloux
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Rethinking the evolutionary theory of aging: transfers, not births, shape senescence in social species.

Authors:  Ronald D Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Kinship dynamics: patterns and consequences of changes in local relatedness.

Authors:  Darren P Croft; Michael N Weiss; Mia L K Nielsen; Charli Grimes; Michael A Cant; Samuel Ellis; Daniel W Franks; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  What Makes You Generous? The Influence of Rural and Urban Rearing on Social Discounting in China.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Guanxiong Pei; Jia Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High Risk versus Proportional Benefit: Modelling Equitable Strategies in Cardiovascular Prevention.

Authors:  Ivanny Marchant; Jean-Pierre Boissel; Patrice Nony; François Gueyffier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.