INTRODUCTION: Chronic opioid therapy for non-malignant pain has greatly expanded, increasing the urgency of identifying those experiencing problems related to prescribed opioids. The Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire (PDUQ), which shares substantial content with subsequently developed instruments, was developed within a pain clinic setting designed to identify problematic opioid use. The utility of the PDUQ and its relationship with the DSM-IV approach needs to be established for patients being treated in general medical settings. METHODS: Patients (n=704) from a large HMO prescribed opioids chronically were interviewed using the PDUQ and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) DSM-IV opioid abuse and dependence instrument. The internal reliability of the PDUQ was assessed. Factor analytic procedures were utilized to determine the factor structure of the PDUQ alone and in combination with CIDI DSM-IV. RESULTS: The internal reliability of the PDUQ in this population was poor (Cronbach's coefficient alpha=0.56) compared to the original development study (alpha=0.81). Factor analysis of a reduced set of PDUQ items yielded three factors: addictive behaviors, addictive concerns, and pain treatment problems. Factor analysis combining DSM-IV and PDUQ items indicated abuse and dependence were a single, distinct factor. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of chronic pain patients on opioids in a general medical population, the PDUQ performed differently than in previously described pain clinic populations. CIDI DSM-IV items were distinct from a reduced set of PDUQ items, suggesting the need to reconsider approaches to the measurement of opioid problems for these patients. The four factors identified deserve further study, as they may signal the need for distinct interventions to improve the care of patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy for pain.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic opioid therapy for non-malignant pain has greatly expanded, increasing the urgency of identifying those experiencing problems related to prescribed opioids. The Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire (PDUQ), which shares substantial content with subsequently developed instruments, was developed within a pain clinic setting designed to identify problematic opioid use. The utility of the PDUQ and its relationship with the DSM-IV approach needs to be established for patients being treated in general medical settings. METHODS:Patients (n=704) from a large HMO prescribed opioids chronically were interviewed using the PDUQ and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) DSM-IV opioid abuse and dependence instrument. The internal reliability of the PDUQ was assessed. Factor analytic procedures were utilized to determine the factor structure of the PDUQ alone and in combination with CIDI DSM-IV. RESULTS: The internal reliability of the PDUQ in this population was poor (Cronbach's coefficient alpha=0.56) compared to the original development study (alpha=0.81). Factor analysis of a reduced set of PDUQ items yielded three factors: addictive behaviors, addictive concerns, and pain treatment problems. Factor analysis combining DSM-IV and PDUQ items indicated abuse and dependence were a single, distinct factor. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of chronic painpatients on opioids in a general medical population, the PDUQ performed differently than in previously described pain clinic populations. CIDI DSM-IV items were distinct from a reduced set of PDUQ items, suggesting the need to reconsider approaches to the measurement of opioid problems for these patients. The four factors identified deserve further study, as they may signal the need for distinct interventions to improve the care of patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy for pain.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Jamie Abelson; Olga Demler; Javier I Escobar; Miriam Gibbon; Margaret E Guyer; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; William A Vega; Ellen E Walters; Philip Wang; Alan Zaslavsky; Hui Zheng Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: M Carrington Reid; Laura L Engles-Horton; MaryAnn B Weber; Robert D Kerns; Elizabeth L Rogers; Patrick G O'Connor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laura L Adams; Robert J Gatchel; Richard C Robinson; Peter Polatin; Noor Gajraj; Martin Deschner; Carl Noe Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Cynthia I Campbell; Constance Weisner; Linda Leresche; G Thomas Ray; Kathleen Saunders; Mark D Sullivan; Caleb J Banta-Green; Joseph O Merrill; Michael J Silverberg; Denise Boudreau; Derek D Satre; Michael Von Korff Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mark D Sullivan; Michael Von Korff; Caleb Banta-Green; Joseph O Merrill; Kathleen Saunders Journal: Pain Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Shannon M Smith; Florence Paillard; Andrew McKeown; Laurie B Burke; Robert R Edwards; Nathaniel P Katz; Elektra J Papadopoulos; Bob A Rappaport; Ashley Slagle; Eric C Strain; Ajay D Wasan; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Caleb J Banta-Green; Michael Von Korff; Mark D Sullivan; Joseph O Merrill; Suzanne R Doyle; Kathleen Saunders Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Enrique R Pouget; Alex S Bennett; Luther Elliott; Brett Wolfson-Stofko; Ramona Almeñana; Peter C Britton; Andrew Rosenblum Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: William C Becker; Liana Fraenkel; E Jennifer Edelman; Stephen R Holt; Janis Glover; Robert D Kerns; David A Fiellin Journal: Pain Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Caleb J Banta-Green; Joseph O Merrill; Suzanne R Doyle; Denise M Boudreau; Donald A Calsyn Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 4.492