Literature DB >> 19473458

Physician and patient satisfaction with the new AMS 700 momentary squeeze inflatable penile prosthesis.

L Dean Knoll1, Gerard Henry2, Daniel Culkin3, Dana A Ohl4, Juan Otheguy5, Ridwan Shabsigh6, Steven K Wilson7, John Delk Ii8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A single-armed, prospective, multicenter study evaluated the redesigned American Medical Systems (AMS) 700 Momentary Squeeze (MS) pump inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) with enhanced features for ease of implantation and patient manipulation. The device incorporates design changes to all components: pump, cylinders, rear-tip extenders, and reservoir. AIM: To assess physician and patient satisfaction with the new AMS 700 MS pump.
METHODS: Patients were selected from the existing population experiencing erectile dysfunction (ED) without previous prosthetic implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey questionnaires were used to capture physician feedback on ease of implantation and patient education. Patient satisfaction with the device and existence of autoinflation were assayed.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were implanted at seven U.S. sites. Mean age was 60.1 +/- 9.6 years. History of ED was >5 years in 34 (44.7%) patients. Main ED etiology was organic, nonspecific (32%). Eighty-four percent of the physicians felt proximal cylinder insertion was easier because of the smaller angle of cylinder input tubing and narrower base diameter. The new pump was felt easier to implant than the previous model by 57% of the physicians. The patients found the manipulation of the pump simple at device activation, with 96% easily locating the inflation bulb and 94% deflating the device with one push of the deflation button. Reviews were mixed among physicians concerning ease of training compared with the Tactile pump. Patient training was easier in 71%, harder in 21%, and same in 8%. Nevertheless, 67% of the patients were trained in 6 minutes or less. At 6 months, 77% of the patients were very satisfied, 9% somewhat satisfied, and 14% dissatisfied. Autoinflation occurred in two patients (3%).
CONCLUSION: The new AMS 700 MS IPP seems a distinct improvement over previous devices with most physicians feeling implantation and patient instruction were easier. The device also satisfied 86% of the users and virtually eliminated autoinflation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473458     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  10 in total

Review 1.  Innovating Incrementally: Development of the Modern Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Ehlers; Benjamin McCormick; R Matthew Coward; Bradley D Figler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  "Pumpology": the Realistic Issues Associated with Pump Placement in Prosthetic Surgery.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Grande; Gabriele Antonini; Cristiano Cristini; Ettore De Berardinis; Antonio Gatto; Giovanni Di Lascio; Andrea Lemma; Giuseppe Gentile; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Primary versus revision implant for inflatable penile prosthesis: A propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Andrea Lemma; Giovanni Di Lascio; Alessandro El Motassime; Pietro Grande; Ivan Di Giulio; Stefano Salciccia; Martina Maggi; Gabriele Antonini; Ettore De Berardinis; Cristiano Cristini; Alessandro Sciarra
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.532

5.  Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants.

Authors:  Wesley Baas; Blake O'Connor; Charles Welliver; Peter J Stahl; Doron S Stember; Steven K Wilson; Tobias S Köhler
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

Review 6.  Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction.

Authors:  Timothy K O'Rourke; Alexander Erbella; Yu Zhang; Matthew S Wosnitzer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 7.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 8.  Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

Review 9.  Surgical patient selection and counseling.

Authors:  Matt Ziegelmann; Tobias S Köhler; George C Bailey; Tanner Miest; Manaf Alom; Landon Trost
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08

10.  Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses.

Authors:  Javier Romero Otero; César Rojas Cruz; Borja García Gómez; Joaquim Sarquella Geli; Jose Medina Polo; Eduard Ruiz Castañé; Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.