Literature DB >> 19473406

Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model.

Ophélie Ronce1, Frank H Shaw, François Rousset, Ruth G Shaw.   

Abstract

Despite abundant empirical evidence that inbreeding depression varies with both the environment and the genotypic context, theoretical predictions about such effects are still rare. Using a quantitative genetics model, we predict amounts of inbreeding depression for fitness emerging from Gaussian stabilizing selection on some phenotypic trait, on which, for simplicity, genetic effects are strictly additive. Given the strength of stabilizing selection, inbreeding depression then varies simply with the genetic variance for the trait under selection and the distance between the mean breeding value and the optimal phenotype. This allows us to relate the expected inbreeding depression to the degree of maladaptation of the population to its environment. We confront analytical predictions with simulations, in well-adapted populations at equilibrium, as well as in maladapted populations undergoing either a transient environmental shift, or gene swamping in heterogeneous habitats. We predict minimal inbreeding depression in situations of extreme maladaptation. Our model provides a new basis for interpreting experiments that measure inbreeding depression for the same set of genotypes in different environments, by demonstrating that the history of adaptation, in addition to environmental harshness per se, may account for differences in inbreeding depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473406     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00678.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  J Costa E Silva; C Hardner; P Tilyard; B M Potts
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Epigenetics as a new avenue for the role of inbreeding depression in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  P-O Cheptou; K Donohue
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Variation in inbreeding depression and plasticity across native and non-native field environments.

Authors:  C J Murren; M R Dudash
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Changing environments and genetic variation: natural variation in inbreeding does not compromise short-term physiological responses.

Authors:  James Buckley; Rónán Daly; Christina A Cobbold; Karl Burgess; Barbara K Mable
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Do marginal plant populations enhance the fitness of larger core units under ongoing climate change? Empirical insights from a rare carnation.

Authors:  Domenico Gargano; Liliana Bernardo; Simone Rovito; Nicodemo G Passalacqua; Thomas Abeli
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 6.  Quantitative genetic study of the adaptive process.

Authors:  R G Shaw; F H Shaw
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Inbreeding depression does not increase in foreign environments: a field experimental study.

Authors:  Joe Hereford
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  The evolution of the additive variance of a trait under stabilizing selection after autopolyploidization.

Authors:  Josselin Clo
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.516

9.  Microgeographic maladaptive performance and deme depression in response to roads and runoff.

Authors:  Steven P Brady
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Lower selfing rates in metallicolous populations than in non-metallicolous populations of the pseudometallophyte Noccaea caerulescens (Brassicaceae) in Southern France.

Authors:  Mathilde Mousset; Patrice David; Christophe Petit; Juliette Pouzadoux; Clémence Hatt; Élodie Flaven; Ophélie Ronce; Agnès Mignot
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.