Literature DB >> 19473299

Warfarin is not needed in low-risk patients following atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.

T Jared Bunch1, Brian G Crandall, J Peter Weiss, Heidi T May, Tami L Bair, Jeffrey S Osborn, Jeffrey L Anderson, Donald L Lappe, J Brent Muhlestein, Jennifer Nelson, Scott Allison, Thomas Foley, Lars Anderson, John D Day.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recently published HRS/EHRA/ECAS AF Ablation Consensus Statement recommended that warfarin should be used for at least 2 months following an AF ablation in all patients regardless of stroke risk factors. The objective of the study was to assess outcomes based upon anticoagulation practice after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to determine relative risk of a strategy of aspirin only in low-risk patients.
METHODS: A total of 630 consecutive patients who underwent 934 ablation procedures using an open irrigated tip catheter for symptomatic AF were evaluated. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with warfarin (goal INR: 2-3) versus aspirin only (325 mg/day) in CHADS2 0-1 patients after ablation.
RESULTS: Of the 690 patients, 123 (20%) were treated with aspirin and 507 (80%) with warfarin. Prevalences of the CHADS2 scores of patients on aspirin were (0: 40.7%, 1: 59.3%) and on warfarin (0: 13.6%, 1: 31.6%, > or = 2: 54.8%), P < 0.0001. Patients in the warfarin group were older, had on average a lower ejection fraction, and had higher rates persistent/permanent AF, repeat ablations, hypertension, prior stroke/TIA, and diabetes. The 1-year survival free of AF for the total study population was 71.6%. There were no strokes/TIA in the aspirin group and 4 events (4 strokes, 0 TIAs) in the warfarin group. Two patients in the warfarin group died of fatal hemorrhage (1 intracranial, 1 gastrointestinal).
CONCLUSION: Select low-risk patients with a low CHADS2 (0-1) score who undergo left atrial ablation with an aggressive anticoagulation strategy with heparin and use of an open irrigated tip catheter with low CHADS2 scores can safely be discharged following their procedure on aspirin alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473299     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01481.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  15 in total

Review 1.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and its Impact on Stroke.

Authors:  Kevin G Graves; Victoria Jacobs; Heidi T May; Michael J Cutler; John D Day; T Jared Bunch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 3.  Comparing Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Andreas Rillig; Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl Heinz Kuck; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 4.  Can oral anticoagulants be stopped safely after a successful atrial fibrillation ablation?

Authors:  Tze-Fan Chao; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Fa-Po Chung; Jo-Nan Liao; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sara R Vazquez; Stacy A Johnson; Matthew T Rondina
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Optimal strategies including use of newer anticoagulants for prevention of stroke and bleeding complications before, during, and after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Authors:  Prashant D Bhave; Bradley P Knight
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

7.  Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation - Long-term Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Tze-Fan Chao; Chern-En Chiang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-11-29

8.  Peri-procedural interrupted oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.

Authors:  Roger A Winkle; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Melissa H Kong; Rob A Patrawala
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Safety and efficacy of switching anticoagulation to aspirin three months after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jae-Sun Uhm; Hoyoun Won; Boyoung Joung; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; Moon-Hyoung Lee; You-Ho Kim; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Sequelae after AF ablation: Efficacy and Safety go Hand in Hand.

Authors:  Yves De Greef; R Tavernier; M Duytschaever
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.