Literature DB >> 19473061

Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty: single center experience.

Narmada P Gupta1, Satyadip Mukherjee, Rishi Nayyar, Ashok Kumar Hemal, Rajeev Kumar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the technical feasibility of the transmesocolic approach of robotic pyeloplasty for left ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2006 and December 2007, 60 patients underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty that included 33 cases on the right side and 27 cases on the left side. Of the 27 left-side cases, 24 were performed using a transmesocolic approach. Three left-side surgeries were performed by mobilizing the colon because of associated accessory vessel and renal calculi. A pure robot-assisted dismembered reduction pyeloplasty with excision of the ureteropelvic junction was performed in all cases.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 125.33 minutes. The time to perform the anastomosis was 43.58 minutes, and mean blood loss 38.7 mL. Average hospital stay was 2.5 days, and the drain was removed within 48 hours. One patient had prolonged drainage with fever because of a misplaced ureteral stent. Of the 24 patients, 23 were followed for 1 year and 1 was lost to follow-up. No patient demonstrated clinical or radiographic evidence of repeated obstruction.
CONCLUSION: In the transmesocolic approach, mobilization of the colon is not necessary, and the UPJO can be approached directly after incising the mesocolon. This approach is safe and feasible in patients with a thin mesentry and when extensive mobilization of the kidney is not needed for any associated problems. The technique is highly effective with durable success rates similar to those of open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473061     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook.

Authors:  Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-01

3.  Robotic transmesocolonic Pyelolithotomy of horseshoe kidney.

Authors:  Emad S Rajih; Mohammed F Al-Otaibi; Waleed K Alkhudair
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Reduction corporoplasty.

Authors:  Tariq S Hakky; Daniel Martinez; Christopher Yang; Rafael E Carrion
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A single surgeon concurrent cohort review.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Brusabhanu Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-01

6.  Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Won Sik Ham; Jang Hwan Kim; Chang Hee Hong; Young Deuk Choi; Sang Won Han; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches to the ureter: Pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation.

Authors:  Dinesh Samarasekera; Robert J Stein
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07

8.  Prospective randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Jatinder Kumar; A N Sachin; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.