Literature DB >> 19472625

Accuracy in breast shape alignment with 3D surface fitting algorithms.

Marco Riboldi1, David P Gierga, George T Y Chen, Guido Baroni.   

Abstract

Surface imaging is in use in radiotherapy clinical practice for patient setup optimization and monitoring. Breast alignment is accomplished by searching for a tentative spatial correspondence between the reference and daily surface shape models. In this study, the authors quantify whole breast shape alignment by relying on texture features digitized on 3D surface models. Texture feature localization was validated through repeated measurements in a silicone breast phantom, mounted on a high precision mechanical stage. Clinical investigations on breast shape alignment included 133 fractions in 18 patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation. The breast shape was detected with a 3D video based surface imaging system so that breathing was compensated. An in-house algorithm for breast alignment, based on surface fitting constrained by nipple matching (constrained surface fitting), was applied. Results were compared with a commercial software where no constraints are utilized (unconstrained surface fitting). Texture feature localization was validated within 2 mm in each anatomical direction. Clinical data show that unconstrained surface fitting achieves adequate accuracy in most cases, though nipple mismatch is considerably higher than residual surface distances (3.9 mm vs 0.6 mm on average). Outliers beyond 1 cm can be experienced as the result of a degenerate surface fit, where unconstrained surface fitting is not sufficient to establish spatial correspondence. In the constrained surface fitting algorithm, average surface mismatch within 1 mm was obtained when nipple position was forced to match in the [1.5; 5] mm range. In conclusion, optimal results can be obtained by trading off the desired overall surface congruence vs matching of selected landmarks (constraint). Constrained surface fitting is put forward to represent an improvement in setup accuracy for those applications where whole breast positional reproducibility is an issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472625     DOI: 10.1118/1.3086079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  2 in total

1.  Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Spadea; Barbara Tagaste; Marco Riboldi; Eleonora Preve; Daniela Alterio; Gaia Piperno; Cristina Garibaldi; Roberto Orecchia; Antonio Pedotti; Guido Baroni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Target position reproducibility in left-breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold using multiple optical surface control points.

Authors:  Aurora Fassi; Giovanni B Ivaldi; Paola Tabarelli de Fatis; Marco Liotta; Ilaria Meaglia; Patrizia Porcu; Lea Regolo; Marco Riboldi; Guido Baroni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.