Literature DB >> 19472406

The clinical application of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer.

Hiroyuki Kato1, Masanobu Nakajima, Makoto Sohda, Naritaka Tanaka, Takanori Inose, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Minoru Fukuchi, Noboru Oriuchi, Keigo Endo, Hiroyuki Kuwano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metabolic tumor activity using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was believed to have a predictive value for patient outcome in malignancies. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic effectiveness of the highest standardized uptake value (SUV) in the primary or regional area (peak SUV) and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with 184 consecutive esophageal cancer patients imaged preoperatively using FDG-PET scanning.
RESULTS: The median peak SUV was 4.5 (range, 1.4-21.9). The survival curve was analyzed using the median peak SUV as the cutoff value. Comparison of each group and clinicopathologic characteristics revealed significant associations between peak SUV and each of the following factors: tumor status (P < .001), lymph node status (P < .001), metastatic status (P < .05), stage of disease (P < .001), number of PET-positive lymph nodes (P < .001), and the number of histologically positive lymph nodes (P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients having FDG uptake with a peak SUV > or =4.5 was 47% and that for patients with a peak SUV <4.5 was 76% (P < .0001). On multivariate survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, peak SUV and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes were found to be independent predictive factors for OS. The number of PET-positive lymph nodes was a single prognostic factor predicting both disease-free survival and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment PET cannot only potentially diagnose the extent of disease, but also may be predictive of patient survival after esophageal cancer resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472406     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) measured by [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Masato Kita; Kayo Suzuki; Michio Senda; Yuji Nakamoto; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Tong Dai; Elizabeta Popa; Manish A Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Doctor, what does my future hold? The prognostic value of FDG-PET in solid tumours.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Patterns and time of recurrence after complete resection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masahiko Sugiyama; Masaru Morita; Rintaro Yoshida; Koji Ando; Akinori Egashira; Ohga Takefumi; Hiroshi Saeki; Eiji Oki; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  SUVmax on FDG-PET is a predictor of prognosis in patients with maxillary sinus cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Doi; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Kazuhito Fukushima; Yusuke Kawanaka; Miya Mouri; Satoshi Yamamoto; Reiichi Ishikura; Tomonori Terada; Kazuma Noguchi; Shozo Hirota
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Nidal M Albarghach; Florent Tixier; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze-le Rest
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prognostic value of FDG uptake in primary inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  An-Na Tong; Shao-Rong Han; Peng Yan; Hai Gong; Hui Zhao; Hui Yao; Yan-Ming Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in resectable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jang Eun Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Jin Su Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Won Kyung Kang; Seong Taek Oh; Ie Ryung Yoo; Sung Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  (18)F-FDG uptake at initial staging of the adrenocortical cancers: a diagnostic tool but not of prognostic value.

Authors:  L Tessonnier; C Ansquer; C Bournaud; F Sebag; E Mirallié; J C Lifante; F F Palazzo; I Morange; D Drui; C de la Foucardère; J Mancini; D Taïeb
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.