Literature DB >> 19472386

Whole heart magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession coronary vein MRI.

Christian T Stoeck1, Yuchi Han, Dana C Peters, Peng Hu, Susan B Yeon, Kraig V Kissinger, Beth Goddu, Lois Goepfert, Warren J Manning, Sebastian Kozerke, Reza Nezafat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare two coronary vein imaging techniques using whole-heart balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) and a targeted double-oblique spoiled gradient-echo (GRE) sequences in combination with magnetization transfer (MT) preparation sequence for tissue contrast improvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy subjects were imaged with the proposed technique. The results are compared with optimized targeted MT prepared GRE acquisitions. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed to evaluate each imaging method.
RESULTS: Whole-heart images were successfully acquired with no visible image artifact in the vicinity of the coronary veins. The anatomical features and visual grading of both techniques were comparable. However, the targeted small slab acquisition of the left ventricular lateral wall was superior to whole-heart acquisition for visualization of relevant information for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) lead implantation.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of whole-heart coronary vein MRI using a 3D MT-SSFP imaging sequence. A targeted acquisition along the lateral left ventricular wall is preferred for visualization of branches commonly used in CRT lead implantation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472386     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of the coronary venous system in heart failure patients by blood pool agent enhanced whole-heart MRI.

Authors:  Robert Manzke; Ludwig Binner; Axel Bornstedt; Nico Merkle; Anja Lutz; Robert Gradinger; Volker Rasche
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Optimization of free-breathing whole-heart 3-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla to identify coronary vein anatomy and to compare with multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Wael G Ibrahim; Riham H El Khouli; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Jatin Raj Matta; Dorothea McAreavey; Ahmed M Gharib
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Time-resolved analysis of coronary vein motion and cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Jonathan D Suever; Pierre J Watson; Robert L Eisner; Stamatios Lerakis; Robert E O'Donnell; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for guiding left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mads Brix Kronborg; Won Yong Kim; Peter Thomas Mortensen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Contrast-free high-resolution 3D magnetization transfer imaging for simultaneous myocardial scar and cardiac vein visualization.

Authors:  Karina López; Radhouene Neji; Rahul K Mukherjee; John Whitaker; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Reza Razavi; Claudia Prieto; Sébastien Roujol; René Botnar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T for the evaluation of cardiac venous anatomy.

Authors:  Heng Ma; Qing Tang; Qi Yang; Xiaoming Bi; Han Li; Lan Ge; Kai Lin; Dong Xu; Xiangying Du; Jie Lu; Jing An; Lixin Jin; Renate Jerecic; Kuncheng Li; Debiao Li
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Non-contrast enhanced simultaneous 3D whole-heart bright-blood pulmonary veins visualization and black-blood quantification of atrial wall thickness.

Authors:  Giulia Ginami; Karina Lòpez; Rahul K Mukherjee; Radhouene Neji; Camila Munoz; Sébastien Roujol; Peter Mountney; Reza Razavi; René M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene M Botnar; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.