Literature DB >> 19472298

Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature.

Kerry A Sherman1, Nadine A Kasparian, Shab Mireskandari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For women at high risk of developing hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer the process of undergoing genetic testing is anxiety provoking and stressful, entailing difficult and complex decisions. Partners of high-risk women are frequently perceived by the women as a source of support during this challenging time. Utilising Self Regulatory Theory, this paper provides a theoretically guided overview of existing data to delineate how partners respond emotionally and behaviourally to the woman's high-risk status.
METHODS: An extensive literature search was undertaken. Online searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were conducted, reference lists of all publications identified were examined; and the databases were searched for authors identified in these publications.
RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 10 published studies on at-risk women and their male partners; one study did not investigate male partner distress as an outcome variable. Heterogeneity of methodology in this literature precluded quantitative meta-analyses of study outcomes. Review of the evidence suggests that the genetic testing process may be distressing for some partners, particularly for partners of women identified as mutation carriers. Associations were identified between partner distress and partner beliefs about the woman's perceived breast cancer risk; partner feelings of social separation and lack of couple communication; and partner perceptions of being alienated from the testing process. Lack of partner support was found to be associated with increased distress of the tested woman at the time of testing and following results disclosure. Data are lacking on the role of partner beliefs about breast cancer, partner perceived consequences of genetic testing, and personality factors such as information processing style, on partner distress.
CONCLUSIONS: The high level of behavioural and psychological interdependence that exists between a tested woman and her partner means that future research seeking to understand the coping and adjustment processes of partners needs to adopt a dyadic, transactional approach that is grounded in psychological theory. Specific suggestions for future research in this context are delineated. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19472298     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  8 in total

1.  The Effects of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Pasquale Colloca
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Adaptation of couples living with a high risk of breast/ovarian cancer and the association with risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Shapira; Erin Turbitt; Lori H Erby; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein; Gillian W Hooker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; George Luta; Beth N Peshkin; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Caitlin Mauer; Sara Spencer; Jeffery Dungan; Karen Hurley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Individual differences in physical symptom burden and psychological responses in individuals with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Eleshia J Morrison; Joseph M Flynn; Jeffrey Jones; John C Byrd; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health.

Authors:  Mhairi Campbell; Matt Egan; Theo Lorenc; Lyndal Bond; Frank Popham; Candida Fenton; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-13

Review 8.  Family Adjustment to Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pedro Gomes; Giada Pietrabissa; Eunice R Silva; João Silva; Paula Mena Matos; Maria Emília Costa; Vanessa Bertuzzi; Eliana Silva; Maria Carolina Neves; Célia M D Sales
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.