Literature DB >> 1947200

Blocking observed in human eyelid conditioning.

I Martin1, A B Levey.   

Abstract

Four eyelid conditioning experiments designed to be comparable to rabbit nictitating membrane (NMR) studies examined the blocking phenomenon in humans. All experiments utilized a within-subjects design, with Stage 1 of discrimination, Stage 2 of compound training, and a final test stage comparing responding to the blocked and non-blocked CSs. In two of the experiments (1 and 4) the comparison was made within subjects over all extinction trials. In Experiment 3 the test phase consisted of further reinforced training of the blocked and non-blocked CSs. These three experiments produced evidence of blocking when all extinction trials were entered into the analysis. Experiment 2, which involved a between-subjects comparison, failed to demonstrate the blocking effect. Wide variability both between and within subjects obscured the experimental effects. Post-experimental questionnaires designed to assess awareness of stimulus relations failed to identify a subjective blocking effect and showed no relationship to conditioned eyelid responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1947200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  10 in total

Review 1.  Parallel neural systems for classical conditioning: support from computational modeling.

Authors:  M T Allen; C E Myers; M A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

2.  Similarity in Spatial Origin of Information Facilitates Cue Competition and Interference.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Amundson; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2007-05

3.  Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996)

Authors:  M R Waldmann; K J Holyoak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

4.  Causal order does not affect cue selection in human associative learning.

Authors:  D R Shanks; F J Lopez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

5.  A comparison of latent inhibition and learned irrelevance pre-exposure effects in rabbit and human eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Lori Chelius; Vivek Masand; Mark A Gluck; Catherine E Myers; Geoffrey Schnirman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep

6.  Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

7.  Explaining compound generalization in associative and causal learning through rational principles of dimensional generalization.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Samuel J Gershman; Yael Niv
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Fixed-interval performance and self-control in infants.

Authors:  J C Darcheville; V Rivière; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pavlovian conditioning in human skilled motor behavior.

Authors:  H Rübeling
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar

10.  Human neural learning depends on reward prediction errors in the blocking paradigm.

Authors:  Philippe N Tobler; John P O'doherty; Raymond J Dolan; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.