Literature DB >> 19471562

Experiences of pretreatment laparoscopic surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective study.

Myong Cheol Lim1, Jaeman Bae, Jeong-Yoel Park, Soyi Lim, Sokbom Kang, Sang-Soo Seo, Joo-Yong Kim, Ju-Won Rho, Sang-Yoon Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and survival of laparoscopic surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
METHODS: From Oct 2001 to Jul 2006, a total of 83 consecutive patients were eligible for inclusion and underwent laparoscopic surgical staging.
RESULTS: Three patients with intraoperative great vessel injury and 1 patient in whom the colpotomizer was unable to be inserted were excluded. Laparoscopic surgical staging was feasible in 95.2% (79/83). Immediate postoperative complications were noted in 12 (15.2%) patients. Prolonged complications directly related to operative procedures numbered 2 (2.5%), and were trocar site metastases. The mean time from surgery to the start of radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was 11 (5-35) days. All patients tolerated the treatment well and completed scheduled RT or CCRT without disruption of treatment and additional admission. The rate of modification of the radiation field after surgical staging was 8.9% (7/79). Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 79% and 89%, respectively. The OS of patients with microscopic lymph node metastases, which were fully resected, were comparable to those of patients without lymph node metastasis. However, the OS of patients with macroscopic lymph node metastases that were fully resected were poorer compared with those of patients without lymph node metastasis.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment laparoscopic surgical staging is a feasible and safe treatment modality. However the survival benefit of debulking lymph nodes or full lymph node dissection is not clear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic surgical staging; Lymph nodes

Year:  2008        PMID: 19471562      PMCID: PMC2676459          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2008.19.2.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


  35 in total

1.  Carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  J L Benedet; F Odicino; P Maisonneuve; U Beller; W T Creasman; A P Heintz; H Y Ngan; S Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by immediate laparotomy in women with cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  John B Schlaerth; Nicola M Spirtos; Linda F Carson; Guy Boike; Thomas Adamec; Bette Stonebraker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Hsueh Chou; Ting-Chang Chang; Tzu-Chen Yen; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Shih-Ya Ma; Chee-Jen Chang; Huei-Jean Huang; Angel Chao; Tzu-I Wu; Shih-Ming Jung; Yen-Ching Wu; Cheng-Tao Lin; Kuan-Gen Huang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Laparoscopic staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: A new possible philosophy?

Authors:  J Vidaurreta; A Bermúdez; G di Paola; J Sardi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  D Querleu; D Dargent; Y Ansquer; E Leblanc; F Narducci
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.

Authors:  R C Boronow; C P Morrow; W T Creasman; P J Disaia; S G Silverberg; A Miller; J A Blessing
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A modified incision and technique for total retroperitoneal access and lymph node dissection.

Authors:  S A Vasilev
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Wu C Lin; Yao C Hung; Lian S Yeh; Chia H Kao; Ruoh F Yen; Yeh Y Shen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Possover; N Krause; K Plaul; R Kühne-Heid; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Survival benefit of laparoscopic surgical staging-guided radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Dae Gy Hong; Nae Yoon Park; Gun Oh Chong; Young Lae Cho; Il Soo Park; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  General health status of long-term cervical cancer survivors after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lee Sung Uk; Kim Young Ae; Yoon Young-Ho; Kim Yeon-Joo; Lim Myong Cheol; Park Sang-Yoon; Seo Sang-Soo; Park Ji Eun; Kim Joo-Young
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Cost-effectiveness of para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jung Yun Lee; Younhee Kim; Tae Jin Lee; Yong Woo Jeon; Kidong Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Hak Jae Kim; Sang Min Park; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Joo; Young Seok Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.