OBJECTIVE: To investigate interhemispheric and intrahemispheric reorganization in patients with localization-related epilepsy. METHOD: We studied 50 patients with a left hemispheric focus and 20 normal right-handed controls with a 3T echoplanar imaging blood oxygen level dependent functional MRI auditory-based word definition decision task. Data were analyzed using SPM 2. Using region of interest for Broca and Wernicke areas and an asymmetry index (AI), patients were categorized as left language (LL; AI > or = 0.20) or atypical language (AL; AI <0.20) for region. The point maxima activation for normal controls (p <0.05 corrected FDR) was identified in Broca and midtemporal regions and then used as a point of reference for individual point maxima identified at p < 0.001, uncorrected. RESULTS: Patient groups showed increased frequency of having activation in right homologues. Activation in AL groups occurred in homologous right regions; distances for point maxima activation in homologous regions were the same as point maxima distances in normal control activation in left regions. Distances for LL patient in left regions showed a trend for differences for midtemporal gyrus (6 mm posterior, 3 mm superior) but variability around mean difference distance was significant. There was no effect of age at epilepsy onset, duration, or pathology on activation maxima. CONCLUSIONS: Right hemisphere language regions in patients with left hemispheric focus are homologues of left hemisphere Broca and broadly defined Wernicke areas. We found little evidence for intrahemispheric reorganization in patients with left hemisphere epilepsy who remain left language dominant by these methods.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate interhemispheric and intrahemispheric reorganization in patients with localization-related epilepsy. METHOD: We studied 50 patients with a left hemispheric focus and 20 normal right-handed controls with a 3T echoplanar imaging blood oxygen level dependent functional MRI auditory-based word definition decision task. Data were analyzed using SPM 2. Using region of interest for Broca and Wernicke areas and an asymmetry index (AI), patients were categorized as left language (LL; AI > or = 0.20) or atypical language (AL; AI <0.20) for region. The point maxima activation for normal controls (p <0.05 corrected FDR) was identified in Broca and midtemporal regions and then used as a point of reference for individual point maxima identified at p < 0.001, uncorrected. RESULTS:Patient groups showed increased frequency of having activation in right homologues. Activation in AL groups occurred in homologous right regions; distances for point maxima activation in homologous regions were the same as point maxima distances in normal control activation in left regions. Distances for LL patient in left regions showed a trend for differences for midtemporal gyrus (6 mm posterior, 3 mm superior) but variability around mean difference distance was significant. There was no effect of age at epilepsy onset, duration, or pathology on activation maxima. CONCLUSIONS: Right hemisphere language regions in patients with left hemispheric focus are homologues of left hemisphere Broca and broadly defined Wernicke areas. We found little evidence for intrahemispheric reorganization in patients with left hemisphere epilepsy who remain left language dominant by these methods.
Authors: J A Springer; J R Binder; T A Hammeke; S J Swanson; J A Frost; P S Bellgowan; C C Brewer; H M Perry; G L Morris; W M Mueller Journal: Brain Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Silvia A Bunge; Nicole M Dudukovic; Moriah E Thomason; Chandan J Vaidya; John D E Gabrieli Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-17 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: E Darcy Burgund; Hyunseon Christine Kang; James E Kelly; Randy L Buckner; Abraham Z Snyder; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: W D Gaillard; L Balsamo; B Xu; C B Grandin; S H Braniecki; P H Papero; S Weinstein; J Conry; P L Pearl; B Sachs; S Sato; B Jabbari; L G Vezina; C Frattali; W H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-07-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J Spreer; S Arnold; A Quiske; R Wohlfarth; S Ziyeh; D Altenmüller; M Herpers; J Kassubek; J Klisch; B J Steinhoff; J Honegger; A Schulze-Bonhage; M Schumacher Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2002-05-08 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: W D Gaillard; M M Berl; E N Moore; E K Ritzl; L R Rosenberger; S L Weinstein; J A Conry; P L Pearl; F F Ritter; S Sato; L G Vezina; C J Vaidya; E Wiggs; C Fratalli; G Risse; N B Ratner; G Gioia; W H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Partovi; B Jacobi; N Rapps; L Zipp; S Karimi; F Rengier; J K Lyo; C Stippich Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Xiaozhen You; Malek Adjouadi; Magno R Guillen; Melvin Ayala; Armando Barreto; Naphtali Rishe; Joseph Sullivan; Dennis Dlugos; John Vanmeter; Drew Morris; Elizabeth Donner; Bruce Bjornson; Mary Lou Smith; Byron Bernal; Madison Berl; William D Gaillard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: W D Gaillard; M M Berl; E S Duke; E Ritzl; S Miranda; C Liew; A Finegersh; A Martinez; I Dustin; S Sato; W H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Madison M Berl; Elizabeth S Duke; Jessica Mayo; Lisa R Rosenberger; Erin N Moore; John VanMeter; Nan Bernstein Ratner; Chandan J Vaidya; William Davis Gaillard Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Elizabeth S Duke; Mekdem Tesfaye; Madison M Berl; Jennifer E Walker; Eva K Ritzl; Rebecca E Fasano; Joan A Conry; Phillip L Pearl; Sususmu Sato; William H Theodore; William D Gaillard Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 5.864