Literature DB >> 19470936

MDM2 and Ki-67 predict for distant metastasis and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: RTOG 92-02.

Li-Yan Khor1, Kyounghwa Bae, Rebecca Paulus, Tahseen Al-Saleem, M Elizabeth Hammond, David J Grignon, Mingxin Che, Varagur Venkatesan, Roger W Byhardt, Marvin Rotman, Gerald E Hanks, Howard M Sandler, Alan Pollack.   

Abstract

PURPOSE MDM2 regulates p53, which controls cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Both proteins, along with Ki-67, which is an established strong determinant of metastasis, have shown promise in predicting the outcome of men treated with radiation therapy (RT) with or without short-term androgen deprivation (STAD). This report compares the utility of abnormal expression of these biomarkers in estimating progression in a cohort of men treated on RTOG 92-02. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adequate tissue for immunohistochemistry was available for p53, Ki-67, and MDM2 analyses in 478 patient cases. The percentage of tumor nuclei staining positive (PSP) was quantified manually or by image analysis, and the per-sample mean intensity score (MIS) was quantified by image analysis. Cox regression models were used to estimate overall mortality (OM), and Fine and Gray's regressions were applied to the end points of distant metastasis (DM) and cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results In multivariate analyses that adjusted for all markers and treatment covariates, MDM2 overexpression was significantly related to DM (P = .02) and OM (P = .003), and Ki-67 overexpression was significantly related to DM (P < .0001), CSM (P = .0007), and OM (P = .01). P53 overexpression was significantly related to OM (P = .02). When considered in combination, the overexpression of both Ki-67 and MDM2 at high levels was associated with significantly increased failure rates for all end points (P < .001 for DM, CSM, and OM). CONCLUSION Combined MDM2 and Ki-67 expression levels were independently related to distant metastasis and mortality and, if validated, could be considered for risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19470936      PMCID: PMC2716939          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

1.  Mapping of the p53 and mdm-2 interaction domains.

Authors:  J Chen; V Marechal; A J Levine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  MDM2 as a predictor of prostate carcinoma outcome: an analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 8610.

Authors:  Li-Yan Khor; Michelle Desilvio; Tahseen Al-Saleem; M Elizabeth Hammond; David J Grignon; William Sause; Michael Pilepich; Paul Okunieff; Howard Sandler; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  p53 status and prognosis of locally advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma: a study based on RTOG 8610.

Authors:  D J Grignon; R Caplan; F H Sarkar; C A Lawton; E H Hammond; M V Pilepich; J D Forman; J Mesic; K K Fu; R A Abrams; T F Pajak; W U Shipley; J D Cox
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  A 60 kd MDM2 isoform is produced by caspase cleavage in non-apoptotic tumor cells.

Authors:  R Pochampally; B Fodera; L Chen; W Shao; E A Levine; J Chen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1998-11-19       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  The radiation response of hormone-resistant prostate cancer induced by long-term hormone therapy.

Authors:  Chun-Te Wu; Wen-Cheng Chen; Shuen-Kuei Liao; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Kuan-Der Lee; Miao-Fen Chen
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  COX-2 expression predicts prostate-cancer outcome: analysis of data from the RTOG 92-02 trial.

Authors:  Li-Yan Khor; Kyounghwa Bae; Alan Pollack; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David J Grignon; Varagur M Venkatesan; Seth A Rosenthal; Mark A Ritter; Howard M Sandler; Gerald E Hanks; William U Shipley; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Stimulation of E2F1/DP1 transcriptional activity by MDM2 oncoprotein.

Authors:  K Martin; D Trouche; C Hagemeier; T S Sørensen; N B La Thangue; T Kouzarides
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Antisense-MDM2 sensitizes LNCaP prostate cancer cells to androgen deprivation, radiation, and the combination in vivo.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Paul Hachem; Harvey Hensley; Li-Yan Khor; Zhaomei Mu; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Sudhir Agrawal; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Prognostic value of p16 in locally advanced prostate cancer: a study based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 9202.

Authors:  Arnab Chakravarti; Michelle DeSilvio; Min Zhang; David Grignon; Seth Rosenthal; Sucha O Asbell; Gerald Hanks; Howard M Sandler; Li-Yan Khor; Alan Pollack; William Shipley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Regulation of androgen receptor and histone deacetylase 1 by Mdm2-mediated ubiquitylation.

Authors:  Luke Gaughan; Ian R Logan; David E Neal; Craig N Robson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone.

Authors:  Mark Wade; Yunyuan V Wang; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  An N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E splice isoform induces tumor growth and is a biomarker for predicting future metastasis in human cancers.

Authors:  Terence K Lee; Saravana R K Murthy; Niamh X Cawley; Savita Dhanvantari; Stephen M Hewitt; Hong Lou; Tracy Lau; Stephanie Ma; Thanh Huynh; Robert A Wesley; Irene O Ng; Karel Pacak; Ronnie T Poon; Y Peng Loh
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

4.  MDM2 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stabilization in hypoxia.

Authors:  Sheng Zhou; Lubing Gu; Jing He; Hailong Zhang; Muxiang Zhou
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Regulation of Mdm2 protein stability and the p53 response by NEDD4-1 E3 ligase.

Authors:  C Xu; C D Fan; X Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  RNA interference against MDM2 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in pancreatic carcinoma SW1990HM cells.

Authors:  Weidong Shi; Zhiqiang Meng; Zhen Chen; Yongqiang Hua; Huifeng Gao; Peng Wang; Junhua Lin; Zhenhua Zhou; Jianmin Luo; Luming Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 7.  Pharmacotherapeutic management of locally advanced prostate cancer: current status.

Authors:  Jarad M Martin; Stephane Supiot; Dominik R Berthold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Which, when and why? Rational use of tissue-based molecular testing in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A E Ross; A V D'Amico; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Prevention of prostate cancer by natural product MDM2 inhibitor GS25: in vitro and in vivo activities and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jiang-Jiang Qin; Xin Li; Guanyu Tao; Qiang Wang; Xuming Wu; Jianwei Zhou; Xiaolin Zi; Ruiwen Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.