Literature DB >> 19470058

Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.

H Dickel1, J Kamphowe, J Geier, P Altmeyer, O Kuss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tape stripping the skin prior to patch testing (strip patch test, SPT) may enhance percutaneous penetration of test substances and increase skin reactivity to test substances.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test sensitivity of SPT in compliance with our recently presented practical method vs. conventional patch test (PT) in nickel- and dichromate-sensitive subjects.
METHODS: Thirty subjects participated in the prospective, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study. Serial dilution tests of nickel sulphate (10,000-50 ppm aq.) and potassium dichromate (1000-5 ppm aq.) were used. Tests were applied in duplicate to both sides of the upper back of the subject, where one, randomly chosen side was tape stripped.
RESULTS: According to the estimated test sensitivities, SPT is more sensitive than PT in nickel- and dichromate-sensitive subjects, regardless of the interindividual different numbers of tape strips. The superiority of the SPT grows with diminishing concentrations of the allergens.
CONCLUSION: Test sensitivity of SPT vs. PT is increased. If no positive results are obtained by PT, the SPT could help to detect hidden allergens in case of weak sensitization or low concentration and poor percutaneous penetration of the test substances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19470058     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis of contact allergy in practice using current guidelines].

Authors:  H Dickel; V Mahler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Association of CD69 up-regulation on CD4+ Cla+ T cells versus patch test, strip patch test and clinical history in nickel sensitization.

Authors:  Heinrich Dickel; O Kuss; J Kamphowe; P Altmeyer; S Höxtermann
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  Civil construction work: The unseen contributor to the occupational and global disease burden.

Authors:  R Sitalakshmi; P Saikumar; P Jeyachandran; Jayakar Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016 May-Aug

Review 4.  Occupational Contact Dermatitis: An Individualized Approach to the Worker with Dermatitis.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Houle; D Linn Holness; Joel DeKoven
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2021-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.