Literature DB >> 19469621

Impact of consanguinity on cancer in a highly endogamous population.

Abdulbari Bener1, Hanadi R El Ayoubi, Lotfi Chouchane, Awab I Ali, Aisha Al-Kubaisi, Haya Al-Sulaiti, Ahmad S Teebi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have indicated that inbreeding has little or no effect on the incidence of cancer. Due to the high prevalence of consanguinity in Qatar (54%), its influence may nevertheless be of special importance. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine whether parental consanguinity affects the risk of cancer in a local Arab highly inbred population.
DESIGN: Matched case-control study.
SETTING: The study was carried out in Al-Amal cancer hospital and primary health care centers in Qatar over a period from August 2008 to February 2009. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 370 Qataris and other Arab expatriates with various types of cancers and 635 controls matched by age and ethnicity. A questionnaire that included socio-demographic information, type of consanguinity, medical history, and tumor grade was designed to collect the information of cases and controls.
RESULTS: The study revealed that the rate of parental consanguinity was similar in both cases (29.5%) and controls (29.9%) with a higher inbreeding coefficient in controls (0.017-/+0.03), compared to cancer patients (0.0155-/+0.03). Other Arab expatriates had a higher incidence of cancer (61.1%) than Qataris (38.9%). The inbreeding coefficient was higher in male cancer patients (0.0189-/+0.03), but lower in female cancer patients (0.014-/+0.03) as compared to controls. Controls were more inbred in the overall studied subjects (23.6%) and women (23.8%) than cases. The coefficient of inbreeding was lower in patients with breast (0.014), skin (0.012), thyroid (0.008) and female genital (0.014) cancers, whereas it was higher in cases for leukemia and lymphoma (0.018), colorectal (0.025) and prostate (0.017), with no significant difference between cases and controls. No significant differences were observed between cases and controls in the parental consanguinity, mean coefficient of inbreeding and proportion of more inbred subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The study findings revealed that although the consanguinity rate is high in our Arab population, it has no effect on the incidence of cancers overall. However, there was an increased risk found for leukemia and lymphoma, colorectal and prostate cancer groups, but a reduced risk in breast, skin, thyroid and female genital cancer groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19469621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  11 in total

1.  Consanguinity, endogamy, and genetic disorders in Tunisia.

Authors:  Nizar Ben Halim; Nissaf Ben Alaya Bouafif; Lilia Romdhane; Rym Kefi Ben Atig; Ibtissem Chouchane; Yosra Bouyacoub; Imen Arfa; Wafa Cherif; Sonia Nouira; Faten Talmoudi; Khaled Lasram; Sana Hsouna; Welid Ghazouani; Hela Azaiez; Leila El Matri; Abdelmajid Abid; Neji Tebib; Marie-Françoise Ben Dridi; Salem Kachboura; Ahlem Amouri; Mourad Mokni; Saida Ben Arab; Koussay Dellagi; Sonia Abdelhak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 2.  Genetic diversity, inbreeding and cancer.

Authors:  Beata Ujvari; Marcel Klaassen; Nynke Raven; Tracey Russell; Marion Vittecoq; Rodrigo Hamede; Frédéric Thomas; Thomas Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Risk of breast and prostate cancer is not associated with increased homozygosity in outbred populations.

Authors:  Victor Enciso-Mora; Fay J Hosking; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Prevalence and determinants of glaucoma in citizens of qatar aged 40 years or older: a community-based survey.

Authors:  Fatma A Al-Mansouri; Aida Kanaan; Hamad Gamra; Rajiv Khandekar; Shakeel P Hashim; Omar Al Qahtani; Mohd Farouk Ahmed
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04

5.  Association of Parental Consanguinity With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Zayed; Justin Z Amarin; Abdallah T Al-Ani; Tareq L Altell; Sultan S Abdelhamid; Murad M Qirem; Suhib M Fahmawi; Sanad M Elshebli; Khair M Hamo; Louay Y Zaghlol; Michael E Tierney; Jana A Zayed; Alireza Haghighi
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

6.  Genome-wide homozygosity signature and risk of Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Amit Sud; Rosie Cooke; Anthony J Swerdlow; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Frequent detection of parental consanguinity in children with developmental disorders by a combined CGH and SNP microarray.

Authors:  Yao-Shan Fan; Xiaomei Ouyang; Jinghong Peng; Stephanie Sacharow; Mustafa Tekin; Deborah Barbouth; Olaf Bodamer; Roman Yusupov; Christina Navarrete; Ana H Heller; Sérgio Dj Pena
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Runs of homozygosity and inbreeding in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Hauke Thomsen; Bowang Chen; Gisella Figlioli; Rossella Elisei; Cristina Romei; Monica Cipollini; Alfonso Cristaudo; Franco Bambi; Per Hoffmann; Stefan Herms; Stefano Landi; Kari Hemminki; Federica Gemignani; Asta Försti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Age-standardized Incidence Rates for Leukemia Associated with Consanguineous Marriages in 68 Countries, an Ecological Study.

Authors:  Mostafa Saadat
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  Evidence of Inbreeding in Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Hauke Thomsen; Miguel Inacio da Silva Filho; Michael Fuchs; Sabine Ponader; Elke Pogge von Strandmann; Lewin Eisele; Stefan Herms; Per Hoffmann; Andreas Engert; Kari Hemminki; Asta Försti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.