Literature DB >> 1946874

Categorical processing of visual stimuli in relation to geometrical, graphemic, or lexical context.

M C McIntyre1, V Di Lollo.   

Abstract

Categorical perception was first demonstrated in studies of speech sounds (Liberman, Harris, Hoffman, & Griffith, 1957). The present work employed visual stimuli to explore categorical responding in relation to the context in which the stimuli were embedded. The target stimulus was a vertical line whose length was varied from 20 to 31 min (approximately) in steps of 1.2 min. Experiment 1 examined the effect of a geometrical context on the subjects' ability to discriminate between pairs of lines. The context improved performance, but produced no evidence of categorical responding. In Experiment 2 a graphemic context depressed performance, but failed to show clear evidence of categorization. By contrast, strong evidence of categorical responding was obtained in Experiment 3, in which the graphemes used in Experiment 2 were embedded in meaningful words. From this pattern of results it is argued that categorical responding is reflective not of relatively peripheral perceptual activity, but of higher-order decision processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1946874     DOI: 10.1007/bf01371822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  9 in total

Review 1.  THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION: A CRITICAL REVIEW.

Authors:  H LANE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  IDENTIFICATION AND DISCRIMINATION FUNCTIONS FOR A VISUAL CONTINUUM AND THEIR RELATION TO THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION.

Authors:  D V CROSS; H L LANE; W C SHEPPARD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

3.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

4.  The ABCs of categorical perception.

Authors:  B Streitfeld; M Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; J H Lazarus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests.

Authors:  J J Godfrey; A K Syrdal-Lasky; K K Millay; C M Knox
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1981-12

9.  Categorical results do not imply categorical perception.

Authors:  J M Hary; D W Massaro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.