Literature DB >> 1946863

Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population.

H M McGee1, C A O'Boyle, A Hickey, K O'Malley, C R Joyce.   

Abstract

Current methods of measuring quality of life (QoL) impose an external value system on individuals, rather than allowing them to describe their lives in terms of those factors which they consider important. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) was developed to overcome such limitations. The QoL of 42 healthy attenders at an international immunization clinic was assessed using SEIQoL. Judgement reliability was high (r = 0.74) and individuals' judgement policies accounted for a large percentage of the variance in overall QoL (R2 = 0.75) demonstrating the construct validity of judgement analysis in this context. In a second study of QoL of out-patient suffering from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (N = 20) or peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (N = 20) was assessed using SEIQoL. Judgement reliability was lower (r = 0.54) although statistically highly significant (P less than 0.01), and the variance in overall QoL judgements explained was high (R2 = 0.74). SEIQoL is an acceptable, reliable and valid technique for measuring individual QoL that takes greater account of individual perspectives than traditional measurement approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1946863     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700022388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  72 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Measuring subjective quality of life in people with serious mental illness using the SEIqoL-DW.

Authors:  P N Prince; G J Gerber
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Design of an individualised measure of the impact of macular disease on quality of life (the MacDQoL).

Authors:  Jan Mitchell; Clare Bradley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Validation of the English version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Wan C Tan; Justina W L Tan; Eric W L Wee; Matthew Niti; Tze P Ng
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100.

Authors:  Suzanne M Skevington; Kathryn A O'Connell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health related quality of life: a changing construct?

Authors:  Jürg Bernhard; Adam Lowy; Natascha Mathys; Richard Herrmann; Christoph Hürny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Defining quality of life.

Authors:  F Quirk; P W Jones
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Impact of photodynamic therapy on quality of life of patients with age-related macular degeneration in Korea.

Authors:  Jinhyun Kim; Hyung Woo Kwak; Won Ki Lee; Ha Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Improving patient-centered medical-surgical nursing practice with quality-of-life assessment.

Authors:  Angela Starkweather
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.